scispace - formally typeset
J

James S. Uleman

Researcher at New York University

Publications -  69
Citations -  5589

James S. Uleman is an academic researcher from New York University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Impression formation & Trait. The author has an hindex of 31, co-authored 69 publications receiving 5356 citations. Previous affiliations of James S. Uleman include York University & University of York.

Papers
More filters
BookDOI

The new unconscious.

TL;DR: Uleman as discussed by the authors discusses the relation between the human Amygdala and cognitive awareness and the power of the subliminal, and proposes a theory of mind based on the notion of intention.
Journal ArticleDOI

When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences

TL;DR: The results of two recall experiments indicate that subjects unintentionally made trait inferences at encoding, which suggests that attributions may be made spontaneously, as part of the routine comprehension of social events.
Journal ArticleDOI

Spontaneous Inferences, Implicit Impressions, and Implicit Theories

TL;DR: Current thinking on some of the most relevant processes, implicit knowledge, and theories, including automatic and controlled processes and their interplay; embodied cognition, including mimicry; and associative versus rule-based processes are described.
Book ChapterDOI

People as Flexible Interpreters: Evidence and Issues from Spontaneous Trait Inference

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate the ways in which readily inferences about others occur when inferences are not the focal task and the evidence and issues from spontaneous trait inference (STI) are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Spontaneous self-descriptions and ethnic identities in individualistic and collectivistic cultures.

TL;DR: The Twenty Statements Test (TST) was administered in Seoul and New York, to 454 students from 2 cultures that emphasize collectivism and individualism, respectively as discussed by the authors. And responses, coded into 33 categories, were classified as either abstract or specific and as either autonomous or social.