J
Jan B. F. van Erp
Researcher at University of Twente
Publications - 131
Citations - 4240
Jan B. F. van Erp is an academic researcher from University of Twente. The author has contributed to research in topics: Poison control & Computer science. The author has an hindex of 30, co-authored 114 publications receiving 3598 citations. Previous affiliations of Jan B. F. van Erp include Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Waypoint navigation with a vibrotactile waist belt
TL;DR: The results show that mapping waypoint direction on the location of vibration is an effective coding scheme that requires no training, but that coding for distance does not improve performance compared to a control condition with no distance information.
Journal ArticleDOI
Vibrotactile in-vehicle navigation system
TL;DR: This study quantitatively supports the claims that a localised vibration or tap is an intuitive way to present direction information, and that employing the tactile channel may release other heavily loaded sensory channels, therefore potentially providing a major safety enhancement.
Journal ArticleDOI
Estimating workload using EEG spectral power and ERPs in the n-back task
Anne-Marie Brouwer,Maarten A. Hogervorst,Jan B. F. van Erp,Tobias Heffelaar,Patrick H Zimmerman,Robert Oostenveld +5 more
TL;DR: Different classification models are developed using ERP features, frequency power features or a combination (fusion), though the fusion model performs better than the other models when only short data segments are available for estimating workload.
Journal ArticleDOI
A tactile P300 brain-computer interface.
TL;DR: The feasibility of a tactile P300 BCI based on EEG responses to vibro-tactile stimuli around the waist and the effect of the number of equally spaced tactors is investigated.
Journal ArticleDOI
Combining and comparing EEG, peripheral physiology and eye-related measures for the assessment of mental workload
TL;DR: The results indicate that EEG performs best, followed by eye related measures and peripheral physiology, and Combining variables from different sensors did not significantly improve workload assessment over the best performing sensor alone.