J
Jarrod Trevathan
Researcher at Griffith University
Publications - 96
Citations - 1040
Jarrod Trevathan is an academic researcher from Griffith University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Common value auction & Bidding. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 95 publications receiving 880 citations. Previous affiliations of Jarrod Trevathan include James Cook University.
Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Detecting Collusive Shill Bidding
Jarrod Trevathan,Wayne Read +1 more
TL;DR: The collusion score, either detects a colluding group, or forces the colluders to act individually like a single shill, in which case they are detected by the shill score algorithm.
Journal ArticleDOI
Smart environmental monitoring and assessment technologies (SEMAT)- a new paradigm for low-cost, remote aquatic environmental monitoring
Jarrod Trevathan,Ron Johnstone +1 more
TL;DR: This paper presents the latest refinement of the SEMAT system in-line with the evolution of existing technologies, inexpensive sensors and environmental monitoring expectations and demonstrates the system’s capabilities to provide ongoing data in near real-time to validate an environmental model of the study site.
Proceedings Article
Undesirable and fraudulent behaviour in online auctions
Jarrod Trevathan,Wayne Read +1 more
TL;DR: This paper investigates undesirable and fraudulent behaviour in online auctions by examining the following practices: bid shielding, shill bidding, bid sniping, siphoning and selling non-existent or misrepresented items.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
An Anonymous and Secure Continuous Double Auction Scheme
TL;DR: It is shown that any existing secure group signature scheme can be used to implement a CDA which has the following characteristics: unforgeability, anonymity, unlinkability, exculpability, coalitionresistance, verifiability, robustness and traceability.
Journal ArticleDOI
Investigating Shill Bidding Behaviour Involving Colluding Bidders
Jarrod Trevathan,Wayne Read +1 more
TL;DR: The collusion score, either detects a colluding group, or forces the colluders to act individually like a single shill, in which case they are detected by the shill score algorithm.