scispace - formally typeset
J

Jenna L. Marquard

Researcher at University of Massachusetts Amherst

Publications -  67
Citations -  695

Jenna L. Marquard is an academic researcher from University of Massachusetts Amherst. The author has contributed to research in topics: Health care & Usability. The author has an hindex of 13, co-authored 61 publications receiving 563 citations. Previous affiliations of Jenna L. Marquard include University of California, Los Angeles & University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

What do physicians read (and ignore) in electronic progress notes

TL;DR: Physicians in this study directed very little attention to medication lists, vital signs or laboratory results compared with the impression and plan section of electronic notes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nurses' behaviors and visual scanning patterns may reduce patient identification errors.

TL;DR: Differences in nurses' behaviors and visual scanning patterns during the medication administration process influence their capacities to identify patient ID errors, including predictable eye fixation sequences across artifacts, whereas non-error-identifying nurses tended to have seemingly random eye fixation sequence.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bar-code verification: Reducing but not eliminating medication errors

TL;DR: Using observation, eye tracking, and clinical simulation with embedded errors, data supported that bar-code verification may reduce but not eliminate patient identification and medication errors during clinical simulation of medication administration.
Journal ArticleDOI

Eye tracking as a debriefing mechanism in the simulated setting improves patient safety practices.

TL;DR: Eye tracking offers a unique opportunity to provide students with objective data about their behaviors during simulation experiences, particularly related to safety practices that involve the comparison of patient stated data to an artifact such as an ID band.
Journal ArticleDOI

Commercial off-the-shelf consumer health informatics interventions: recommendations for their design, evaluation and redesign

TL;DR: CHI designers can employ the use case-based evaluation approach to assess the fit of a CHI intervention with patients' health work, in the context of their daily activities and environment, which would be difficult or impossible to evaluate by laboratory-based studies.