Peritonitis is a common and serious complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Although less than 5% of peritonitis episodes result in death, peritonitis is the direct or major contributing cause of death in around 16% of PD patients (1-6). In addition, severe or prolonged peritonitis leads to structural and functional alterations of the peritoneal membrane, eventually leading to membrane failure. Peritonitis is a major cause of PD technique failure and conversion to long-term hemodialysis (1,5,7,8). Recommendations under the auspices of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) were first published in 1983 and revised in 1993, 1996, 2000, 2005, and 2010 (9-14). The present recommendations are organized into 5 sections: 1. Peritonitis rate 2. Prevention of peritonitis 3. Initial presentation and management of peritonitis 4. Subsequent management of peritonitis 5.

/pdf/ispd-peritonitis-recommendations-2016-update-on-prevention-28ki6os9ax.pdf

Ispd peritonitis recommendations: 2016 update on prevention and treatment

Faculdade de Enfermagem, Nutricao e Fisioterapia,1 Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; Department of Nephrology,2 Serdang Hospital, Jalan Puchong, Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia; Sheffield Kidney Institute,3 Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Nephrology,4 Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Renal Services,5 Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom; Nephrology,6 Sri Ramachandra University, Chennai, India; Dialysis Unit,7 Dianet Dialysis Centers and Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3747/pdi.2010.00087

Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal access

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter-related infections are a major predisposing factor to PD-related peritonitis (1–3). The primary objective of preventing and treating catheter-related infections is to prevent peritonitis.Recommendations on the prevention and treatment of catheter-related infections were published previously together with recommendations on PD peritonitis under the auspices of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) in 1983 and revised in 1989, 1993, 1996, 2000, 2005, and 2010 (4–9). The present recommendations, however, focus on catheter-related infections, while peritonitis will be covered in a separate guideline.These recommendations are evidence-based where such evidence exists. The bibliography is not intended to be comprehensive. When there are many similar reports on the same area, the committee prefers to refer to the more recent publications. In general, these recommendations follow the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system for classification of the level of evidence and grade of recommendations in clinical guideline reports (10). Within each recommendation, the strength of recommendation is indicated as Level 1 (We recommend), Level 2 (We suggest), or Not Graded, and the quality of the supporting evidence is shown as A (high quality), B (moderate quality), C (low quality), or D (very low quality). The recommendations are not meant to be implemented in every situation indiscriminately. Each PD unit should examine its own pattern of infection, causative organisms, and sensitivities and adapt the protocols according to local conditions as necessary. Although many of the general principles presented here could be applied to pediatric patients, we focus on catheter-related infections in adult patients. Clinicians who take care of pediatric PD patients should refer to the latest consensus guideline in this area for detailed treatment regimen and dosage (11).

/pdf/ispd-catheter-related-infection-recommendations-2017-update-hczy8dysvc.pdf

ISPD Catheter-Related Infection Recommendations: 2017 Update.

Background. This review describes the peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter implantation techniques for the treatment of PD. The PD catheter-related complications still cause significant morbidity and mortality, resulting in the necessity to switch to haemodialysis (HD) treatment. Methods. Several catheter insertion techniques, using an open surgical approach, laparoscopic and percutaneous techniques have been employed, with their specific early and late complications and failure rates. Results. Despite the similar outcomes of open surgical versus laparoscopic techniques from randomized studies, the laparoscopic insertion has the major advantage of correct catheter positioning in the lower abdomen, with the possibility of adhesiolysis. The minimal invasive percutaneous insertion bears the risk of bowel perforation and catheter malpositioning, and the outcome of this technique is strongly related to the experience of the surgeon. The major complications of these implantation techniques, like bleeding, dialysate leakage and catheter malpositioning, and their management are discussed in our study. Late peritonitis remains the major drawback of PD treatment, with the need of temporary or permanent changeover to the HD treatment in 10% of the patients. Conclusions. Enrichment of the physician's interest and experience, along with a multidisciplinary approach to outline the optimal strategy of PD-catheter insertion and complication of the treatment, may improve the patients' survival and decrease the morbidity.

/pdf/peritoneal-dialysis-catheter-placement-technique-and-2ndd913y8x.pdf

Peritoneal dialysis catheter placement technique and complications.

https://www.kidney-international.org/article/S0085-2538(15)56279-0/pdf

Jennifer Wong

Papers

A randomized controlled trial of coiled versus straight swan-neck Tenckhoff catheters in peritoneal dialysis patients.