These guidelines were developed jointly by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the Surgical Infection Society (SIS), and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). This work represents an update to the

/pdf/clinical-practice-guidelines-for-antimicrobial-prophylaxis-1gq1adk8ux.pdf

Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery

/pdf/clinical-practice-guidelines-for-antimicrobial-prophylaxis-yxd0y9e4ks.pdf

Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery.

We studied risk factors for postoperative infections at the operative site after hysterectomies. Data were collected prospectively on all women undergoing vaginal hysterectomies (323 patients) or abdominal hysterectomies (1125 patients) at the Boston Hospital for Women between February 1976 and April 1978. Logistic-regression analysis indicated that factors significantly associated (P less than 0.05) with a higher risk of infection at the operative site were increased duration of operation, lack of antibiotic prophylaxis, younger age, being a clinic patient, and an abdominal approach. After these variables were accounted for, the variables of obesity, preoperative functional and anatomical diagnoses, postoperative anatomical and pathological diagnoses, estimated blood loss, menopausal status, and operation by a specific surgeon did not add predictive power. An increasing duration of operation was associated with a decreasing effect of antibiotic prophylaxis, the preventive fraction of which diminished from 80 per cent at one hour to an unmeasurable effect at 3.3 hours.

Risk Factors for Infection at the Operative Site after Abdominal or Vaginal Hysterectomy

Avoiding serious infections associated with abdominal hysterectomy: A meta-analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis

The use of prophylactic antibiotics in surgery is widespread and often inappropriate. The lack of well-designed clinical studies partially explains the present confusion regarding the subject. We reviewed the literature in English on antibiotic prophylaxis through June 1982. Antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the incidence of wound infection after colorectal surgery, vaginal hysterectomy, and laryngeal and oropharyngeal resection for carcinoma, and in high-risk patients undergoing gastroduodenal or biliary surgery. In clean operations such as cardiac surgery, vascular procedures, and orthopedic surgery with placement of prostheses, the high morbidity associated with an infection justifies the use of antibiotics even though the risk of infection is small. There are conflicting data on the usefulness of prophylaxis in abdominal hysterectomy, cesarean section, noncardiac thoracic procedures, and urologic surgery. The effectiveness of prophylaxis in neurosurgery cannot be evaluated at the present time.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical procedures. A critical analysis of the literature.

A double-blind, prospective study over a 12-month period evaluated the effectiveness of cefazolin and cephalexin in reducing infection and morbidity in private patients undergoing vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy. Prophylactic antibiotics reduced febrile morbidity from 74.4% to 20.8% in the vagina

Jennings Rh

Papers

Prophylactic antibiotics in vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.