scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Jerald Greenberg published in 2009"



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors advocate moving to the next step by testing such implications in theory-based studies that implement and assess the impact of interventions designed to promote organizational justice, and they also suggest that such investigations are conducted only rarely and that scholarly values favor research that addresses theoretical issues and that eschew practical applications.
Abstract: Most organizational justice studies focus primarily on theoretical issues and identify implications for practice only in passing. I advocate moving to the next step by testing such implications in theory-based studies that implement and assess the impact of interventions designed to promote organizational justice. Research that promotes organizational justice promises to benefit both organizations and their employees, and may be considered morally appropriate. Although usually not considered in this connection, theory-based application studies also promise to shed light on the theories from which they are derived. Despite these benefits, there are several reasons why such investigations are conducted only rarely. First, because managers tend to be unaware of justice-related problems, they are unlikely to accede to researchers’ requests to address them in research. Second, many researchers erroneously believe that studies assessing ways of improving conditions in organizations lack scientific objectivity. Third, scholarly values favor research that addresses theoretical issues and that eschew practical applications. Finally, the challenges of conducting intervention studies are inclined to be formidable, and these may deter researchers from undertaking such efforts.

95 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Greenberg, 2009a as discussed by the authors pointed out questionable claims regarding the characterization of applied research, why we don't conduct more applied justice research, moral versus instrumental rationales for promoting justice, the validity of intervention studies, and interpretations of Lewin's classic observation about the practical value of theory.
Abstract: With an eye toward promoting applications of organizational justice, I respond to commentaries on my focal article (Greenberg, 2009a). Specifically, I challenge questionable claims regarding (a) characterization of applied research, (b) why we don't conduct more applied justice research, (c) moral versus instrumental rationales for promoting justice, (d) the validity of intervention studies, and (e) interpretations of Lewin's classic observation about the practical value of theory. I also identify and comment upon two suggestions for promoting applied justice research: (a) promoting cooperation between researchers and practitioners and (b) conducting comprehensive, integrative interventions.

7 citations