The science and technology of ultracapacitors are reviewed for a number of electrode materials, including carbon, mixed metal oxides, and conducting polymers. More work has been done using microporous carbons than with the other materials and most of the commercially available devices use carbon electrodes and an organic electrolytes. The energy density of these devices is 3¯5 Wh/kg with a power density of 300¯500 W/kg for high efficiency (90¯95%) charge/discharges. Projections of future developments using carbon indicate that energy densities of 10 Wh/kg or higher are likely with power densities of 1¯2 kW/kg. A key problem in the fabrication of these advanced devices is the bonding of the thin electrodes to a current collector such the contact resistance is less than 0.1 cm2. Special attention is given in the paper to comparing the power density characteristics of ultracapacitors and batteries. The comparisons should be made at the same charge/discharge efficiency.

Ultracapacitors: Why, How, and Where is the Technology

State of art review on conventional and advanced pyrolysis of macroalgae and microalgae for biochar, bio-oil and bio-syngas production

Capacitors began their journey in 1745, and to date have advanced in the form of supercapacitors. Supercapacitors are one of the advanced forms of capacitors with higher energy density, bridging capacitors and batteries. The energy storage through the formation of an electrical double layer is pivotal for supercapacitor technology. Accordingly, to further improve the energy density, surface faradaic (pseudocapacitive) processes are employed, and henceforth, the journey of chemical supercapacitors commenced. Herein, the materials, mechanisms and fabrication of chemical supercapacitors based on metallic compounds and conducting polymers are discussed in detail. The inherent limitations of these materials are addressed, and the feasible mitigation measures are identified. Poor conductivity, slow diffusion kinetics and rapid structural disintegration over cycling are the common constraints of metallic compounds, which can be overcome by preparing conductive nanocomposites. Thus, versatile conductive nanocomposites of metal oxides, hydroxides, carbides, nitrides, phosphides, phosphates, phosphites, and chalcogenides are elaborated. A lack of structural integrity is the prime obstacle for the realization of conducting polymer-based supercapacitors, which may be solved by forming composites with robust support from carbonaceous materials or metallic compounds. Consequently, the composites of polyaniline, polypyrrole, polythiophene and polythiophene-derivatives are discussed. The historical accounts of early stages of works are emphasised in order to review the developmental pathways of chemical supercapacitors. The construction of full cells and their performance data are presented herein, which synchronize the behaviour of practical scaled-up devices. To the best of our knowledge, this review is the first holistic description of chemical supercapacitors based on metallic compounds and conducting polymers from the first reports to recent advancements.

Chemical supercapacitors: a review focusing on metallic compounds and conducting polymers

Nitrogen in bio-oil produced from hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: A review

A state-of-the-art review on dual purpose seaweeds utilization for wastewater treatment and crude bio-oil production

Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of Ulva prolifera macroalgae (UP) was carried out in the presence of three zeolites based catalysts (ZSM-5, Y-Zeolite and Mordenite) with the different weight percentage (10–20 wt%) at 260–300 °C for 15–45 min. A comparison between non-catalytic and catalytic behavior of ZSM-5, Y-Zeolite, and Mordenite in the conversion of Ulva prolifera showed that is affected by properties of zeolites. Maximum bio-oil yield for non-catalytic liquefaction was 16.6 wt% at 280 °C for 15 min. The bio-oil yield increased to 29.3 wt% with ZSM-5 catalyst (15.0 wt%) at 280 °C. The chemical components and functional groups present in the bio-oils are identified by GC-MS, FT-IR, 1H-NMR, and elemental analysis techniques. Higher heating value (HHV) of bio-oil (32.2–34.8 MJ/kg) obtained when catalyst was used compared to the non-catalytic reaction (21.2 MJ/kg). The higher de-oxygenation occurred in the case of ZSM-5 catalytic liquefaction reaction compared to the other catalyst such as Y-zeolite and mordenite. The maximum percentage of the aromatic proton was observed in bio-oil of ZSM-5 (29.7%) catalyzed reaction and minimum (1.4%) was observed in the non-catalyst reaction bio-oil. The use of zeolites catalyst during the liquefaction, the oxygen content in the bio-oil reduced to 17.7%. Aqueous phase analysis exposed that presence of valuables nutrients.

Hydrothermal liquefaction of macroalgae: Influence of zeolites based catalyst on products

Pyrolysis of Ulva prolifera macroalgae (UM), an aquatic biomass, was carried out in a fixed-bed reactor in the presence of three zeolites based catalysts (ZSM-5, Y-Zeolite and Mordenite) with the different catalyst to biomass ratio. A comparison between non-catalytic and catalytic behavior of ZSM-5, Y-Zeolite and Mordenite catalyst in the conversion of UM showed that is affected by properties of zeolites. Bio-oil yield was increased in the presence of Y-Zeolite while decreased with ZSM-5 and Mordenite catalyst. Maximum bio-oil yield for non-catalytic pyrolysis was (38.5 wt%) and with Y-Zeolite catalyst (41.3 wt%) was obtained at 400 °C respectively. All catalyst showed a higher gas yield. The higher gas yield might be attributed to that catalytic pyrolysis did the secondary cracking of pyrolytic volatiles and promoted the larger small molecules. The chemical components and functional groups present in the pyrolytic bio-oils are identified by GC–MS, FT-IR, 1H-NMR and elemental analysis techniques. Phenol observed very less percentage in the case of non-catalytic pyrolysis bio-oil (9.9%), whereas catalytic pyrolysis bio-oil showed a higher percentage (16.1%). The higher amount of oxygen present in raw biomass reduced significantly when used catalyst due to the oxygen reacts with carbon and produce (CO and CO2) and water.

Jiguo Geng

Papers

Hydrothermal liquefaction of macroalgae: Influence of zeolites based catalyst on products

Non-catalytic and catalytic pyrolysis of Ulva prolifera macroalgae for production of quality bio-oil

Facile and fast synthesis of SnO2 quantum dots for high performance solid-state asymmetric supercapacitor

Hierarchical nanostructured Au–SnO2 for enhanced energy storage performance

0D/2D CeO2/BiVO4 S-scheme photocatalyst for production of solar fuels from CO2