J
Johane Patenaude
Researcher at Université de Sherbrooke
Publications - 40
Citations - 522
Johane Patenaude is an academic researcher from Université de Sherbrooke. The author has contributed to research in topics: Health technology & Argument. The author has an hindex of 9, co-authored 40 publications receiving 472 citations. Previous affiliations of Johane Patenaude include Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke & Centre national de la recherche scientifique.
Papers
More filters
Journal Article
Changes in students' moral development during medical school: a cohort study
TL;DR: Temporal variations in students' scores show a levelling process of their moral reasoning, prompting the question whether a hidden curriculum exists in the structure of medical education that inhibits rather than facilitates the development of moral reasoning.
Journal ArticleDOI
A biobank management model applicable to biomedical research
TL;DR: The model presented in this article offers a practical solution on a day-to-day basis for REBs, as well as researchers by promoting an archivist to a pivotal role in the process and assures protection of all participants who altruistically donate their samples to generate and improve knowledge for better diagnosis and medical treatment.
Journal ArticleDOI
Changes in the components of moral reasoning during students' medical education: a pilot study.
TL;DR: The moral reasoning of students in medical education is concerned by students' moral reasoning not developing normally during medical education.
Journal ArticleDOI
Framework for the Analysis of Nanotechnologies’ Impacts and Ethical Acceptability: Basis of an Interdisciplinary Approach to Assessing Novel Technologies
Johane Patenaude,Georges-Auguste Legault,Jacques Beauvais,Louise Bernier,Jean-Pierre Béland,Jean-Pierre Béland,Patrick Boissy,Vanessa Chenel,Charles-Étienne Daniel,Jonathan Genest,Marie-Sol Poirier,Danielle Tapin +11 more
TL;DR: A framework for the analysis of impacts and acceptability is presented and intended to make explicit those various operations required in preparing a judgement about the acceptability of technologies that have been implicit in the classical analysis of toxicological risk.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Social and Ethical Acceptability of NBICs for Purposes of Human Enhancement: Why Does the Debate Remain Mired in Impasse?
TL;DR: An analysis of the factors that contribute to confusion and discord on the topic are advanced, in order to help in understanding why arguments that form a part of the debate between transhumanism and humanism result in a philosophical and ethical impasse.