Review of uncertainty-based multidisciplinary design optimization methods for aerospace vehicles

With higher reliability and safety requirements, reliability-based design has been increasingly applied in multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO). A direct integration of reliability-based design and MDO may present tremendous implementation and numerical difficulties. In this work, a methodology of sequential optimization and reliability assessment for MDO is proposed to improve the efficiency of reliability-based MDO. The central idea is to decouple the reliability analysis from MDO with sequential cycles of reliability analysis and deterministic MDO. The reliability analysis is based on the first-order reliability method (FORM). In the proposed method, the reliability analysis and the deterministic MDO use two MDO strategies, the multidisciplinary feasible approach and the individual disciplinary feasible approach. The effectiveness of the proposed method is illustrated with two example problems.

Sequential optimization and reliability assessment for multidisciplinary systems design

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) is a methodology for finding optimized designs that are characterized with a low probability of failure. Primarily, RBDO consists of optimizing a merit function while satisfying reliability constraints. The reliability constraints are constraints on the probability of failure corresponding to each of the failure modes of the system or a single constraint on the system probability of failure. The probability of failure is usually estimated by performing a reliability analysis. During the last few years, a variety of different formulations have been developed for RBDO. Traditionally, these have been formulated as a double-loop (nested) optimization problem. The upper level optimization loop generally involves optimizing a merit function subject to reliability constraints, and the lower level optimization loop(s) compute(s) the probabilities of failure corresponding to the failure mode(s) that govern(s) the system failure. This formulation is, by nature, computationally intensive. Researchers have provided sequential strategies to address this issue, where the deterministic optimization and reliability analysis are decoupled, and the process is performed iteratively until convergence is achieved. These methods, though attractive in terms of obtaining a workable reliable design at considerably reduced computational costs, often lead to premature convergence and therefore yield spurious optimal designs. In this paper, a novel unilevel formulation for RBDO is developed. In the proposed formulation, the lower level optimization (evaluation of reliability constraints in the double-loop formulation) is replaced by its corresponding first-order Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) necessary optimality conditions at the upper level optimization. Such a replacement is computationally equivalent to solving the original nested optimization if the lower level optimization problem is solved by numerically satisfying the KKT conditions (which is typically the case). It is shown through the use of test problems that the proposed formulation is numerically robust (stable) and computationally efficient compared to the existing approaches for RBDO.

An inverse-measure-based unilevel architecture for reliability-based design optimization

Significant challenges are associated with solving optimal structural design problems involving the failure probability in the objective and constraint functions. In this paper, we develop gradient-based optimization algorithms for estimating the solution of three classes of such problems in the case of continuous design variables. Our approach is based on a sequence of approximating design problems, which is constructed and then solved by a semiinfinite optimization algorithm. The construction consists of two steps: First, the failure probability terms in the objective function are replaced by auxiliary variables resulting in a simplified objective function. The auxiliary variables are determined automatically by the optimization algorithm. Second, the failure probability constraints are replaced by a parametrized first-order approximation. The parameter values are determined in an adaptive manner based on separate estimations of the failure probability. Any computational reliability method, including first-order reliability and second-order reliability methods and Monte Carlo simulation, can be used for this purpose. After repeatedly solving the approximating problem, an approximate solution of the original design problem is found, which satisfies the failure probability constraints at a precision level corresponding to the selected reliability method. The approach is illustrated by a series of examples involving optimal design and maintenance planning of a reinforced concrete bridge girder.

/pdf/optimal-design-with-probabilistic-objective-and-constraints-3abez63fat.pdf

Optimal design with probabilistic objective and constraints

Reliability based design optimization is a methodology for nding optimized designs that are characterized with a low probability of failure. Primarily, reliability based design optimization consists of optimizing a merit function while satisfying reliability constraints. The reliability constraints are constraints on the probability of failure corresponding to each of the failure modes of the system or a single constraint on the system probability of failure. The probability of failure is usually estimated by performing a reliability analysis. During the last few years, a variety of dierent formulations have been developed for reliability based design optimization. Traditionally, these have been formulated as a doubleloop (nested) optimization problems. The upper level optimization loop generally involves optimizing a merit function subject to reliability constraints and the lower level optimization loop(s) compute the probabilities of failure corresponding to the failure mode(s) that govern the system failure. This formulation is, by nature, computationally intensive. Researchers have provided sequential strategies to address this issue, where the deterministic optimization and reliability analysis are decoupled, and the process is performed iteratively until convergence is achieved. These methods, though attractive in terms of obtaining a workable reliable design at considerably reduced computational costs, often lead to premature convergence and therefore, yield spurious optimal designs. In this paper, a novel unilevel formulation for reliability based design optimization is developed. In the proposed formulation, the lower level optimization (evaluation of reliability constraints in the double-loop formulation) is replaced by its corresponding rst order Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) necessary optimality conditions at the upper level optimization. Such a replacement is equivalent to solving the original nested optimization if the constraint qualication conditions are satised. It is shown through the use of test problems that the proposed formulation is numerically robust (stable) and computationally ecient compared to the existing approaches for reliability based design optimization.

A Unilevel Method for Reliability Based Design Optimization

In this investigation, a decomposition approach is employed for reliability-based design optimization of multidisciplinary systems. In the last few years, a variety of different approaches for reliability-based design optimization have been proposed in the literature. Traditionally, reliability-based design optimization is formulated as a nested optimization problem, where the inner loop, generally involves the solution to an optimization problem for computing the probability of failure corresponding to the failure modes. Such a formulation is by nature computationally intensive, requiring a large numbers of function and constraint evaluations. To alleviate this problem, researchers have developed single level reliability-based optimization formulations. The single level approach is expensive for multidisciplinary systems because of the fact that the complex coupled nature of multidisciplinary systems are likewise computationally intensive requiring iterative solvers. To reduce the computational effort of performing reliability-based design optimization in application to multidisciplinary systems, a decomposition approach for optimization is employed. The method of Simultaneous ANalysis and Design (SAND) is employed as an optimization driver within a single level reliability-based design optimization strategy. The methodology is illustrated in application to multidisciplinary test problems.

John D. Mack

Papers

A decomposition approach for reliability-based multidisciplinary design optimization