J
John Dobson
Researcher at Georgia Southern University
Publications - 81
Citations - 1790
John Dobson is an academic researcher from Georgia Southern University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Business ethics & Skeletal muscle. The author has an hindex of 24, co-authored 79 publications receiving 1570 citations. Previous affiliations of John Dobson include University of Mississippi & California Polytechnic State University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The use of formative online quizzes to enhance class preparation and scores on summative exams
TL;DR: It was concluded that the formative online quizzes did enhance summative exam performance and that theOnline quizzes were valid predictors of exam performance.
Journal ArticleDOI
Learning style preferences and course performance in an undergraduate physiology class
TL;DR: The results of this study support the findings of Wehrwein et al. (18): that female and male physiology students have different sensory modality preferences and that they provide the first step in determining if sensory modalities preferences impact final course scores.
Journal ArticleDOI
A comparison between learning style preferences and sex, status, and course performance.
TL;DR: Students have learning style preferences that are often classified according to their visual (V), aural (A), read-write (R), and/or kinesthetic (K) sensory modality preferences, and the associations between those SMPs and status are examined.
Journal ArticleDOI
Benefits of Exercise Intervention in Reducing Neuropathic Pain
TL;DR: Since many of the most common causes of peripheral neuropathy cannot be fully treated, it is critical to understand that routine exercise may not only help prevent some of those causes, but that it has also proven to be an effective means of alleviating some of the condition’s most distressing symptoms.
Journal ArticleDOI
Toward the Feminine Firm: An Extension to Thomas White
John Dobson,Judith White +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the influence of gender on a firm's moral and economic performance is discussed, and the authors suggest that this gender bias may be corrected by drawing on the concept of substantive rationality inherent in virtue-ethics theory, which complements the essential nature of the firm as a nexus of relationships between stakeholders.