scispace - formally typeset
J

John E. Helzer

Researcher at University of Vermont

Publications -  86
Citations -  15216

John E. Helzer is an academic researcher from University of Vermont. The author has contributed to research in topics: Poison control & Alcohol dependence. The author has an hindex of 39, co-authored 86 publications receiving 14923 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

National Institute of Mental Health diagnostic interview schedule: Its history, characteristics, and validity.

TL;DR: In this article, a new interview schedule allows lay interviewers or clinicians to make psychiatric diagnoses according to DSM-III criteria, Feighner criteria, and Research Diagnostic Criteria.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Composite International Diagnostic Interview: An Epidemiologic Instrument Suitable for Use in Conjunction With Different Diagnostic Systems and in Different Cultures

TL;DR: The design and development of the CIDI is described and the current field testing of a slightly reduced "core" version is described, allowing investigators reliably to assess mental disorders according to the most widely accepted nomenclatures in many different populations and cultures.
Journal ArticleDOI

Lifetime Prevalence of Specific Psychiatric Disorders in Three Sites

TL;DR: Lifetime rates are presented for 15 DSM-III psychiatric diagnoses evaluated in three large household samples on the basis of lay interviewers' use of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule.
Journal ArticleDOI

Smoking, smoking cessation, and major depression.

TL;DR: The association between cigarette smoking and major depression was not ubiquitous across all psychiatric diagnoses, and gender differences in rates of smoking and of smoking cessation observed in the larger population were not evident among the depressed group.
Journal ArticleDOI

A proposed solution to the base rate problem in the kappa statistic.

TL;DR: A statistic for the quantification of agreement is proposed (the Y statistic), which can be related to kappa but which is completely independent of prevalence in the case of validity studies and relatively so in the cases of reliability.