J
John Forester
Researcher at Cornell University
Publications - 98
Citations - 10828
John Forester is an academic researcher from Cornell University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Mediation & Policy analysis. The author has an hindex of 29, co-authored 91 publications receiving 10532 citations. Previous affiliations of John Forester include University of Amsterdam.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Planning in the Face of Power.
Deborah M. Kolb,John Forester +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the role and ethics of planners acting as sources of misinformation are considered, and a practical and politically sensitive form of progressive planning practice is defined. But the authors do not discuss the role of planners in this process.
BookDOI
The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning
TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss policy institutions and practices, policy discourse and the politics of Washington think tanks, Frank Fischer Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice, Maarten Hajer Political judgement and the policy cycle -the case of ethnicity arguments in the Netherlands, Robert Hoppe Counsel and consensus -norm of argumentation in health policy, Bruce Jennings.
Book
Planning in the face of power
TL;DR: The role and ethics of planners acting as sources of misinformation are considered in this paper, where several types of misinformation (inevitable or unnecessary, ad hoc or systematic) are distinguished in a reformulation of bounded rationality in planning and practical responses by planning staff are identified.
Posted Content
The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes
TL;DR: In this article, the authors show how skillful deliberative practices can facilitate practical and timely participatory planning processes and provide a window onto the wider world of democratic governance, participation, and practical decision-making.
Book
The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show how skillful deliberative practices can facilitate practical and timely participatory planning processes and provide a window onto the wider world of democratic governance, participation, and practical decision-making.