J
Jonas Tallberg
Researcher at Stockholm University
Publications - 126
Citations - 6334
Jonas Tallberg is an academic researcher from Stockholm University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Global governance & European union. The author has an hindex of 37, co-authored 118 publications receiving 5630 citations. Previous affiliations of Jonas Tallberg include Lund University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The Legitimacy and Legitimation of International Organizations: Introduction and Framework
Jonas Tallberg,Michael Zürn +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, legitimacy is defined as the belief that an authority is appropriately exercised, and legitimacy and delegitimation as processes of justification and contestation intended to shape such beliefs.
Compliance Bargaining in the European Union
Jonas Tallberg,Christer Jönsson +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.
Book ChapterDOI
Conclusion: Rationalist and Sociological Perspectives on the EU Presidency
Ole Elgström,Jonas Tallberg +1 more
Posted Content
Formal Leadership in Multilateral Negotiations: A Rational Institutionalist Theory
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a rational institutionalist theory of formal leadership that provides answers to three central questions: Why do states delegate powers of process control to the chairmanship of international negotiations? What are the power resources of formal leaders? When, why, and how do negotiation chairs wield influence over the outcomes of multilateral bargaining.
Journal ArticleDOI
Orchestrating enforcement : international organizations mobilizing compliance constituencies
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that orchestration of enforcement in both its variants will only happen when three necessary conditions are fulfilled: a) IGOs lack sufficient capabilities to effectively enforce compliance through other governance means; b) private actors hold privileged information about state compliance; and c) I GOs enjoy a capacity for independent action, as shaped by entrepreneurial resources and state oversight.