scispace - formally typeset
J

Jonathan Moo

Researcher at University of Cambridge

Publications -  7
Citations -  52

Jonathan Moo is an academic researcher from University of Cambridge. The author has contributed to research in topics: Covenant & Ethos. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 7 publications receiving 48 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Climate change and the apocalyptic imagination: Science, faith, and ecological responsibility

Jonathan Moo
- 01 Dec 2015 - 
TL;DR: The use of apocalyptic and post apocalyptic narratives to interpret the risk of environmental degradation and climate change has been criticized for making erroneous predictions on the basis of too little evidence, being ineffective to motivate change, leading to a discounting of present needs in the face of an exaggerated threat of impending catastrophe, and relying on a pre-modern, Judeo-Christian mode of constructing reality as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Romans 8.19–22 and Isaiah's Cosmic Covenant

TL;DR: There are striking thematic and verbal parallels between Isaiah 24-27 and Rom 8. as mentioned in this paper suggest that Isaiah provides the primary source for Paul's description of the ruin and groaning of creation in Rom 8, a possibility that is strengthened by the fact that Paul elsewhere explicitly cites Isa 25.8.19-22.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Sea That is No More Rev 21:1 and the Function of Sea Imagery in the Apocalypse of John

Jonathan Moo
- 01 Jan 2009 - 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors categorise the multiple roles in which the sea is no more and address the potential implications of each use of sea imagery for explaining its absence from John's vision of the new heaven and earth, concluding that the difficult phrase in 21:1c is best explained in terms of the use of a new creation typology that serves to highlight the way in which this new creation differs from that described in Gen 1.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Messiah whom ‘The Many Do Not Know’? Rereading 4 Ezra 5:6-7

TL;DR: In this paper, it is argued that the description in 5:6-7 comports well with the way the Messiah is portrayed elsewhere in 4 Ezra, that there are strong links between this ‘eschatological signs’ passage and the visions of chapters 11-13, and that there is little evidence that an Antichrist figure plays any role in the author's eschatological schema.