Joseph Rudman

TL;DR: The statement, ’’Results of most non-traditional authorship attribution studies are not universally accepted as definitive,'' is explicated.

TL;DR: This paper uses an earlier publication as a starting point to assess the present state of non-traditional authorship attribution studies—its successes, failures, problems, and prospects.

TL;DR: This is the fifth in a series of surveys of computer courses for humanists published by Computers and the Humanities to provide information about past and existing courses to those who might be designing a course on the use of the computer for humanist.

TL;DR: Cette bibliographie est concue comme un outil de recherche pour ceux qui veulent animer un cours sur l'utilisation de l'ordinateur a l'attention d'etudiants en lettres, avec une petite analyse critique.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors assume that with those courses reported in the previous surveys, those written up in various journals, and those mentioned in the returns to this survey, a high percentage of the significant computer courses for humanists (within the surveyed population) have been reported.