Journal of the ACM

An introduction to the theory of groups

We show that any randomised Monte Carlo distributed algorithm for the Lovasz local lemma requires Omega(log log n) communication rounds, assuming that it finds a correct assignment with high probability. Our result holds even in the special case of d = O(1), where d is the maximum degree of the dependency graph. By prior work, there are distributed algorithms for the Lovasz local lemma with a running time of O(log n) rounds in bounded-degree graphs, and the best lower bound before our work was Omega(log* n) rounds [Chung et al. 2014].

/pdf/a-lower-bound-for-the-distributed-lovasz-local-lemma-3y5isb7i1o.pdf

A lower bound for the distributed Lovász local lemma

This paper is centered on the complexity of graph problems in the well-studied LOCAL model of distributed computing, introduced by Linial [FOCS '87]. It is widely known that for many of the classic distributed graph problems (including maximal independent set (MIS) and (Δ+1)-vertex coloring), the randomized complexity is at most polylogarithmic in the size n of the network, while the best deterministic complexity is typically 2O(√logn). Understanding and potentially narrowing down this exponential gap is considered to be one of the central long-standing open questions in the area of distributed graph algorithms. We investigate the problem by introducing a complexity-theoretic framework that allows us to shed some light on the role of randomness in the LOCAL model. We define the SLOCAL model as a sequential version of the LOCAL model. Our framework allows us to prove completeness results with respect to the class of problems which can be solved efficiently in the SLOCAL model, implying that if any of the complete problems can be solved deterministically in logn rounds in the LOCAL model, we can deterministically solve all efficient SLOCAL-problems (including MIS and (Δ+1)-coloring) in logn rounds in the LOCAL model. Perhaps most surprisingly, we show that a rather rudimentary looking graph coloring problem is complete in the above sense: Color the nodes of a graph with colors red and blue such that each node of sufficiently large polylogarithmic degree has at least one neighbor of each color. The problem admits a trivial zero-round randomized solution. The result can be viewed as showing that the only obstacle to getting efficient determinstic algorithms in the LOCAL model is an efficient algorithm to approximately round fractional values into integer values. In addition, our formal framework also allows us to develop polylogarithmic-time randomized distributed algorithms in a simpler way. As a result, we provide a polylog-time distributed approximation scheme for arbitrary distributed covering and packing integer linear programs.

On the complexity of local distributed graph problems

We present a simple polylogarithmic-time deterministic distributed algorithm for network decomposition. This improves on a celebrated 2 O(√logn)-time algorithm of Panconesi and Srinivasan [STOC’92] and settles a central and long-standing question in distributed graph algorithms. It also leads to the first polylogarithmic-time deterministic distributed algorithms for numerous other problems, hence resolving several well-known and decades-old open problems, including Linial’s question about the deterministic complexity of maximal independent set [FOCS’87; SICOMP’92]—which had been called the most outstanding problem in the area. The main implication is a more general distributed derandomization theorem: Put together with the results of Ghaffari, Kuhn, and Maus [STOC’17] and Ghaffari, Harris, and Kuhn [FOCS’18], our network decomposition implies that P-RLOCAL = P-LOCAL. That is, for any problem whose solution can be checked deterministically in polylogarithmic-time, any polylogarithmic-time randomized algorithm can be derandomized to a polylogarithmic-time deterministic algorithm. Informally, for the standard first-order interpretation of efficiency as polylogarithmic-time, distributed algorithms do not need randomness for efficiency. By known connections, our result leads also to substantially faster randomized distributed algorithms for a number of well-studied problems including (Δ+1)-coloring, maximal independent set, and Lovasz Local Lemma, as well as massively parallel algorithms for (Δ+1)-coloring.

Polylogarithmic-time deterministic network decomposition and distributed derandomization

There are distributed graph algorithms for finding maximal matchings and maximal independent sets in O(Δ + log^* n) communication rounds; here n is the number of nodes and Δ is the maximum degree. The lower bound by Linial (1987, 1992) shows that the dependency on n is optimal: these problems cannot be solved in o(log^* n) rounds even if Δ = 2. However, the dependency on Δ is a long-standing open question, and there is currently an exponential gap between the upper and lower bounds. We prove that the upper bounds are tight. We show that maximal matchings and maximal independent sets cannot be found in o(Δ + log log n / log log log n) rounds with any randomized algorithm in the LOCAL model of distributed computing. As a corollary, it follows that there is no deterministic algorithm for maximal matchings or maximal independent sets that runs in o(Δ + log n / log log n) rounds; this is an improvement over prior lower bounds also as a function of n.

/pdf/lower-bounds-for-maximal-matchings-and-maximal-independent-2uoyjdgu9c.pdf

Lower Bounds for Maximal Matchings and Maximal Independent Sets

We show that any randomised Monte Carlo distributed algorithm for the Lovasz local lemma requires $\Omega(\log \log n)$ communication rounds, assuming that it finds a correct assignment with high probability. Our result holds even in the special case of $d = O(1)$, where $d$ is the maximum degree of the dependency graph. By prior work, there are distributed algorithms for the Lovasz local lemma with a running time of $O(\log n)$ rounds in bounded-degree graphs, and the best lower bound before our work was $\Omega(\log^* n)$ rounds [Chung et al. 2014].

A Lower Bound for the Distributed Lov\'asz Local Lemma

In the study of deterministic distributed algorithms, it is commonly assumed that each node has a unique O(log n)-bit identifier. We prove that for a general class of graph problems, local algorithms (constant-time distributed algorithms) do not need such identifiers: a port numbering and orientation is sufficient.Our result holds for so-called simple PO-checkable graph optimisation problems; this includes many classical packing and covering problems such as vertex covers, edge covers, matchings, independent sets, dominating sets, and edge dominating sets. We focus on the case of bounded-degree graphs and show that if a local algorithm finds a constant-factor approximation of a simple PO-checkable graph problem with the help of unique identifiers, then the same approximation ratio can be achieved on anonymous networks.As a corollary of our result, we derive a tight lower bound on the local approximability of the minimum edge dominating set problem. By prior work, there is a deterministic local algorithm that achieves the approximation factor of 4--1/⌊Δ/2⌋ in graphs of maximum degree Δ. This approximation ratio is known to be optimal in the port-numbering model—our main theorem implies that it is optimal also in the standard model in which each node has a unique identifier.Our main technical tool is an algebraic construction of homogeneously ordered graphs: We say that a graph is (α,r)-homogeneous if its nodes are linearly ordered so that an α fraction of nodes have pairwise isomorphic radius-r neighbourhoods. We show that there exists a finite (α,r)-homogeneous 2k-regular graph of girth at least g for any α

/pdf/lower-bounds-for-local-approximation-598sa0uk1g.pdf

Lower bounds for local approximation

A number of recent papers – e.g. Brandt et al. (STOC 2016), Chang et al. (FOCS 2016), Ghaffari & Su (SODA 2017), Brandt et al. (PODC 2017), and Chang & Pettie (FOCS 2017) – have advanced our understanding of one of the most fundamental questions in theory of distributed computing: what are the possible time complexity classes of LCL problems in the LOCAL model? In essence, we have a graph problem Π in which a solution can be verified by checking all radius-O(1) neighbourhoods, and the question is what is the smallest T such that a solution can be computed so that each node chooses its own output based on its radius-T neighbourhood. Here T is the distributed time complexity of Π. The time complexity classes for deterministic algorithms in bounded-degree graphs that are known to exist by prior work are Θ(1), Θ(log* n), Θ(logn), Θ(n1/k), and Θ(n). It is also known that there are two gaps: one between ω(1) and o(loglog* n), and another between ω(log* n) and o(logn). It has been conjectured that many more gaps exist, and that the overall time hierarchy is relatively simple – indeed, this is known to be the case in restricted graph families such as cycles and grids. We show that the picture is much more diverse than previously expected. We present a general technique for engineering LCL problems with numerous different deterministic time complexities, including Θ(logα n) for any α ≥ 1, 2Θ(logα n) for any α ≤ 1, and Θ(nα) for any α α log* n) for any α ≥ 1, 2Θ(logα log* n) for any α ≤ 1, and Θ((log* n)α) for any α ≤ 1 in the low end of the complexity spectrum; here α is a positive rational number.

/pdf/new-classes-of-distributed-time-complexity-nw1c5tluub.pdf

Juho Hirvonen

Papers

A lower bound for the distributed Lovász local lemma

Lower Bounds for Maximal Matchings and Maximal Independent Sets

A Lower Bound for the Distributed Lov\'asz Local Lemma

Lower bounds for local approximation

New classes of distributed time complexity