Doppler Tissue Imaging: A Noninvasive Technique for Evaluation of Left Ventricular Relaxation and Estimation of Filling Pressures

Relation of transmitral flow velocity patterns to left ventricular diastolic function: New insights from a combined hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic study

New Doppler echocardiographic applications for the study of diastolic function

Evaluation of diastolic filling of the heart has been difficult because of its complexity and the numerous interrelated contributing factors. Previous determinations have depended on high-fidelity, invasive measurements of instantaneous pressure, volume, mass, and wall stress, which could not be done on a routine clinical basis. With the advent of Doppler echocardiography, intracardiac blood flow velocities can now be noninvasively assessed. For application of this technique to evaluation of diastolic function in patients with heart disease, it is necessary to understand what the Doppler-derived variables represent. It is also necessary to know how they are affected by changes in loading conditions and changes in myocardial relaxation. In this review, we provide an interpretation of the mitral valve, tricuspid valve, and systemic and pulmonary venous inflow velocities in the normal patient and in various disease states.

Assessment of diastolic function of the heart: background and current applications of Doppler echocardiography. Part II. Clinical studies.

Preload dependence of doppler-derived indexes of left ventricular diastolic function in humans

Peak rapid filling rate (PRFR) is often used clinically as an index of left ventricular relaxation, i.e., of early diastolic function. This study tests the hypothesis that early filling rate is a function of the atrioventricular pressure difference and hence is influenced by the left atrial pressure as well as by the rate of left ventricular relaxation. As indexes, we chose the left atrial pressure at the atrioventricular pressure crossover (PCO), and the time constant (T) of an assumed exponential decline in left ventricular pressure. We accurately determined the magnitude and timing of filling parameters in conscious dogs by direct measurement of phasic mitral flow (electromagnetically) and high-fidelity chamber pressures. To obtain a diverse hemodynamic data base, loading conditions were changed by infusions of volume and angiotensin II. The latter was administered to produce a change in left ventricular pressure of less than 35% (A-1) or a change in peak left ventricular pressure of greater than 35% (A-2). PRFR increased with volume loading, was unchanged with A-1, and was decreased with A-2; T and PCO increased in all three groups (p less than .005 for all changes). PRFR correlated strongly with the diastolic atrioventricular pressure difference at the time of PRFR (r = .899, p less than .001) and weakly with both T (r = .369, p less than .01) and PCO (r = .601, p less than .001). The correlation improved significantly when T and PCO were both included in the multivariate regression (r = .797, p less than .0001). PRFR is thus determined by both the left atrial pressure and the left ventricular relaxation rate and should be used with caution as an index of left ventricular diastolic function.

K. Tsujioka

Papers

Left ventricular filling dynamics: influence of left ventricular relaxation and left atrial pressure.