Showing papers by "K. van Bibber published in 1990"
TL;DR: Reasonable agreement is found with several different models, including those in the relativistic impulse approximation, nonrelativistic calculations that include meson-exchange currents, isobar configurations, and six-quark configurations, but all calculations are very sensitive to the choice of deuteron wave function and nucleon form factor parametrization.
Abstract: Measurements of the deuteron elastic magnetic structure function B(${\mathit{Q}}^{2}$) are reported at squared four-momentum transfer values 1.20\ensuremath{\le}${\mathit{Q}}^{2}$\ensuremath{\le}2.77 (GeV/c${)}^{2}$. Also reported are values for the proton magnetic form factor ${\mathit{G}}_{\mathit{M}\mathit{p}}$(${\mathit{Q}}^{2}$) at 11 ${\mathit{Q}}^{2}$ values between 0.49 and 1.75 (GeV/c${)}^{2}$. The data were obtained using an electron beam of 0.5 to 1.3 GeV. Electrons backscattered near 180\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{} were detected in coincidence with deuterons or protons recoiling near 0\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{} in a large solid-angle double-arm spectrometer system. The data for B(${\mathit{Q}}^{2}$) are found to decrease rapidly from ${\mathit{Q}}^{2}$=1.2 to 2 (GeV/c${)}^{2}$, and then rise to a secondary maximum around ${\mathit{Q}}^{2}$=2.5 (GeV/c${)}^{2}$. Reasonable agreement is found with several different models, including those in the relativistic impulse approximation, nonrelativistic calculations that include meson-exchange currents, isobar configurations, and six-quark configurations, and one calculation based on the Skyrme model. All calculations are very sensitive to the choice of deuteron wave function and nucleon form factor parametrization. The data for ${\mathit{G}}_{\mathit{M}\mathit{p}}$(${\mathit{Q}}^{2}$) are in good agreement with the empirical dipole fit.
61 citations