scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Kaiming He published in 2012"


Book ChapterDOI
Kaiming He1, Jian Sun1
07 Oct 2012
TL;DR: This paper observation that if the authors match similar patches in the image and obtain their offsets (relative positions), the statistics of these offsets are sparsely distributed means that a few dominant offsets provide reliable information for completing the image.
Abstract: Image completion involves filling missing parts in images. In this paper we address this problem through the statistics of patch offsets. We observe that if we match similar patches in the image and obtain their offsets (relative positions), the statistics of these offsets are sparsely distributed. We further observe that a few dominant offsets provide reliable information for completing the image. With these offsets we fill the missing region by combining a stack of shifted images via optimization. A variety of experiments show that our method yields generally better results and is faster than existing state-of-the-art methods.

221 citations


Proceedings ArticleDOI
Kaiming He1, Jian Sun1
16 Jun 2012
TL;DR: A novel propagation search method for kd-trees where the tree nodes checked by each query are propagated from the nearby queries, which not only avoids the time-consuming backtracking in traditional tree methods, but is more accurate.
Abstract: Matching patches between two images, also known as computing nearest-neighbor fields, has been proven a useful technique in various computer vision/graphics algorithms. But this is a computationally challenging nearest-neighbor search task, because both the query set and the candidate set are of image size. In this paper, we propose Propagation-Assisted KD-Trees to quickly compute an approximate solution. We develop a novel propagation search method for kd-trees. In this method the tree nodes checked by each query are propagated from the nearby queries. This method not only avoids the time-consuming backtracking in traditional tree methods, but is more accurate. Experiments on public data show that our method is 10–20 times faster than the PatchMatch method [4] at the same accuracy, or reduces its error by 70% at the same running time. Our method is also 2–5 times faster and is more accurate than Coherency Sensitive Hashing [22], a latest state-of-the-art method.

144 citations