scispace - formally typeset
K

Kathy L. Chapman

Researcher at University of Utah

Publications -  45
Citations -  1725

Kathy L. Chapman is an academic researcher from University of Utah. The author has contributed to research in topics: Language acquisition & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 23, co-authored 41 publications receiving 1597 citations. Previous affiliations of Kathy L. Chapman include Purdue University & Case Western Reserve University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Vocal Development of 9-Month-Old Babies with Cleft Palate.

TL;DR: The prelinguistic vocal development of 9-month-old babies with unrepaired cleft palate and age-matched peers was compared, and it was indicated that the babies with Cleft palate had smaller canonical babbling ratios than their age- matched peers.
Journal ArticleDOI

Phonologic processes in children with cleft palate.

TL;DR: Results indicated that the 3- and 4-year old children with cleft palate exhibited more instances of process usage, compared to their noncleft peers.
Journal ArticleDOI

The relationship between early speech and later speech and language performance for children with cleft lip and palate

TL;DR: Results revealed differences between the groups for several measures of speech and lexical development at 21 months, and correlational analyses suggested that true stop production, both immediately before and after palatal surgery, was positively correlated with a majority of the speech production measures at21 months.
Journal ArticleDOI

Early Lexical Acquisition in Children with Specific Language Impairment

TL;DR: For both groups of language-impaired children, words containing initial consonants within the children's production repertoires were more likely to be acquired in production than words containing consonants absent from theChildren's phonologies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Phonetic and phonologic skills of two-year-olds with cleft palate.

TL;DR: A comparison between the groups indicated that although the children with cleft palate exhibited more errors overall, they were similar to their noncleft peers in their phonologic process usage with two exceptions.