TOPICAL REVIEW: Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine

The physical principles underlying some current biomedical applications of magnetic nanoparticles are reviewed. Starting from well-known basic concepts, and drawing on examples from biology and biomedicine, the relevant physics of magnetic materials and their responses to applied magnetic fields are surveyed. The way these properties are controlled and used is illustrated with reference to (i) magnetic separation of labelled cells and other biological entities; (ii) therapeutic drug, gene and radionuclide delivery; (iii) radio frequency methods for the catabolism of tumours via hyperthermia; and (iv) contrast enhancement agents for magnetic resonance imaging applications. Future prospects are also discussed.

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0022-3727/36/13/201/pdf

Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine

Preface.- Contributors.- List of Abbreviations.- Section 1: Basic Principles: Introduction.-Sources of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soils.- Chemistry of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soils.- Methods for the Determination of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soils.- Effects of Heavy Metals and Metalloids on Soil Organisms.- Soil-Plant Relationships of Heavy Metals and Metalloids.- Heavy Metals and Metalloids as Micronutrients for Plants and Animals.-Critical Loads of Heavy Metals for Soils.- Section 2: Key Heavy Metals And Metalloids: Arsenic.- Cadmium.- Chromium and Nickel.- Cobalt and Manganese.- Copper.-Lead.- Mercury.- Selenium.- Zinc.- Section 3: Other Heavy Metals And Metalloids Of Potential Environmental Significance: Antimony.- Barium.- Gold.- Molybdenum.- Silver.- Thallium.- Tin.- Tungsten.- Uranium.- Vanadium.- Glossary of Specialized Terms.- Index.

Heavy metals in soils : trace metals and metalloids in soils and their bioavailability

Microbes play key geoactive roles in the biosphere, particularly in the areas of element biotransformations and biogeochemical cycling, metal and mineral transformations, decomposition, bioweathering, and soil and sediment formation. All kinds of microbes, including prokaryotes and eukaryotes and their symbiotic associations with each other and 'higher organisms', can contribute actively to geological phenomena, and central to many such geomicrobial processes are transformations of metals and minerals. Microbes have a variety of properties that can effect changes in metal speciation, toxicity and mobility, as well as mineral formation or mineral dissolution or deterioration. Such mechanisms are important components of natural biogeochemical cycles for metals as well as associated elements in biomass, soil, rocks and minerals, e.g. sulfur and phosphorus, and metalloids, actinides and metal radionuclides. Apart from being important in natural biosphere processes, metal and mineral transformations can have beneficial or detrimental consequences in a human context. Bioremediation is the application of biological systems to the clean-up of organic and inorganic pollution, with bacteria and fungi being the most important organisms for reclamation, immobilization or detoxification of metallic and radionuclide pollutants. Some biominerals or metallic elements deposited by microbes have catalytic and other properties in nanoparticle, crystalline or colloidal forms, and these are relevant to the development of novel biomaterials for technological and antimicrobial purposes. On the negative side, metal and mineral transformations by microbes may result in spoilage and destruction of natural and synthetic materials, rock and mineral-based building materials (e.g. concrete), acid mine drainage and associated metal pollution, biocorrosion of metals, alloys and related substances, and adverse effects on radionuclide speciation, mobility and containment, all with immense social and economic consequences. The ubiquity and importance of microbes in biosphere processes make geomicrobiology one of the most important concepts within microbiology, and one requiring an interdisciplinary approach to define environmental and applied significance and underpin exploitation in biotechnology.

http://dzumenvis.nic.in/Physiology/pdf/Metals,%20minerals%20and%20microbes.pdf

Metals, minerals and microbes: geomicrobiology and bioremediation

Remediation of heavy metal(loid)s contaminated soils - To mobilize or to immobilize?

Microbial manganese oxide formation and interaction with toxic metal ions

Enzymatic formation of manganese oxides by an Acremonium-like hyphomycete fungus, strain KR21-2.

In batch culture experiments we examined oxidation of As(III) and adsorption of As(III/V) by biogenic manganese oxide formed by a manganese oxide-depositing fungus, strain KR21-2. We expected to gain insight into the applicability of Mn-depositing microorganisms for biological treatment of As-contaminated waters. In cultures containing Mn2+ and As(V), the solid Mn phase was rich in bound Mn2+ (molar ratio, ∼30%) and showed a transiently high accumulation of As(V) during the early stage of manganese oxide formation. As manganese oxide formation progressed, a large proportion of adsorbed As(V) was subsequently released. The high proportion of bound Mn2+ may suppress a charge repulsion between As(V) and the manganese oxide surface, which has structural negative charges, promoting complex formation. In cultures containing Mn2+ and As(III), As(III) started to be oxidized to As(V) after manganese oxide formation was mostly completed. In suspensions of the biogenic manganese oxides with dissolved Mn2+, As(III) o...

Interaction of inorganic arsenic with biogenic manganese oxide produced by a Mn-oxidizing fungus, strain KR21-2.

Microbial decolorization of melanoidin-containing wastewaters: Combined use of activated sludge and the fungus Coriolus hirsutus

The characteristics of Co(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II) sorption on freshly produced biogenic Mn oxides by a Mn-oxidizing fungus, strain KR21-2, were investigated. The biogenic Mn oxides showed about 10-fold higher efficiencies for sorbing the metal ions than a synthetic Mn oxide (γ-MnO2) on the basis of unit weight and unit surface area. The order of sorption efficiency on the biogenic Mn oxides was Co(II) > Zn(II) > Ni(II), while that on the synthetic Mn oxide was Zn(II) > Co(II) > Ni(II). These sorption selectivities were confirmed by both sorption isotherms and competitive sorption experiments. Two-step extraction, using 10 mM CuSO4 solution for exchangeable sorbed ions and 10–20 mM hydroxylamine hydrochloride for ions bound to reducible Mn oxide phase, showed higher irreversibility of Co(II) and Ni(II) sorption on the biogenic Mn oxides while Zn(II) sorption was mostly reversible (Cu(II)-exchangeable). Sorptions of Co(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II) on the synthetic Mn oxide were, however, found to be mos...

Keisuke Iwahori

Papers

Microbial manganese oxide formation and interaction with toxic metal ions

Enzymatic formation of manganese oxides by an Acremonium-like hyphomycete fungus, strain KR21-2.

Interaction of inorganic arsenic with biogenic manganese oxide produced by a Mn-oxidizing fungus, strain KR21-2.

Microbial decolorization of melanoidin-containing wastewaters: Combined use of activated sludge and the fungus Coriolus hirsutus

Sorption of Co(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II) on Biogenic Manganese Oxides Produced by a Mn-Oxidizing Fungus, Strain KR21-2