The participants at the conference were asked to focus on the relevant literature published between 2011 and 2015. They met over two and a half days, in which data and new evidence were presented. The participants then retreated to break-out sessions according to their disciplines and were required to answer questions listed in a workbook created by the session chairs and the organizing committee. The workbook questions were tailored on the text of the initial guidelines framework [2, 4] , focusing on the new available evidence. All relevant areas were updated via a thorough literature review and the questions that the chairpersons considered appropriate to discuss the new evidence. All participants were encouraged to challenge the document. Recent data on new evidence and insights were intensely discussed in working-group sessions as well as during the plenary session. Notes were taken continuously, so that the final agreement on each question was noted and returned to each session chair for preparation of the consensus statements. The magnitude of the consensus for each answer was estimated to achieve unanimity. In addition to providing textual guidelines, delegates were requested to elaborate accurate but simple Several guidelines and standards of care on the management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have been published by expert national and international groups in recent years [1–9] ; additional changes in how these patients are managed are evolving rapidly, and since the last European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) Guidelines in 2011/12 [8] , new important data have become available pertaining to novel diagnostic tools and therapies. On October 30th and 31st, 2014, the ENETS held an Advisory Board meeting in Vienna aiming at critically discussing and updating the ENETS Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors generated initially in 2005–2006 [2, 4] and revised in 2011 [8] . The consensus sessions covered the following neuroendocrine neoplasm-related topics by sites of origin or stage: gastroduodenal, midgut (including appendix), hindgut, functional pancreatic, non-functional pancreatic, and two final sessions that covered liver and other distant metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms of any origin and a separate session devoted to neuroendocrine high-grade tumors and carcinomas. Published online: January 6, 2016

/pdf/enets-2016-consensus-guidelines-for-the-management-of-11zy6q4t3o.pdf

ENETS 2016 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Digestive Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Update.

Background and Purpose: Stroke-associated immunosuppression and inflammation are increasingly recognized as factors that trigger infections and thus, potentially

/pdf/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio-is-an-independent-predictor-1q3y7hmftu.pdf

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Is an Independent Predictor for In-Hospital Mortality in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage

The Abstract is essential. It should be printed on a separate page (up to 200 words; any abbreviations must be explained) and structured as follows: Background: Rationale and purpose of the study. Methods: How the study was performed (samples and/or population, procedures, analytical methods). Results: The main findings with specific data and their statistical significance, when applicable. Conclusions: A succinct interpretation of the data presented. Abstracts of Reviews: Should be divided into the following subsections: Background, Summary and Key Messages. The Background should provide a brief clinical context for the review and is followed by the Summary, which should include a concise description of the main topics covered in the text. The Key Messages encapsulate the main conclusions of the review.s of Reviews: Should be divided into the following subsections: Background, Summary and Key Messages. The Background should provide a brief clinical context for the review and is followed by the Summary, which should include a concise description of the main topics covered in the text. The Key Messages encapsulate the main conclusions of the review. Text: The following are typical main headings used in the text: Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion. Abbreviations must be defined where first mentioned in the abstract and the main text. Footnotes: Avoid using footnotes in the text. When essential, they are numbered consecutively and typed at the bottom of the appropriate page. In the tables, footnotes are indicated by superscript numerals. Acknowledgments and funding: This section (when appropriate) should list all sources of funding for the research presented in the manuscript, and substantive D ow nl oa de d by : 20 7. 46 .1 3. 18 5 8/ 2/ 20 16 7 :2 1: 01 A M

/pdf/the-global-burden-of-stroke-5c09gwv0lp.pdf

The Global Burden of Stroke.

Background: Intravenous (IV) iron preparations are widely used in the treatment of anemia in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). All IV iron preparations carry

/pdf/distinct-in-vitro-complement-activation-by-various-4nt6s5z9gi.pdf

Distinct in vitro Complement Activation by Various Intravenous Iron Preparations.

Background: Vitamin D deficiency, sympathetic activation and endothelial dysfunction are associated with increased cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic ki

KR Sundaram

Papers

Using and understanding medical statistics: 5th, revised and extended edition