scispace - formally typeset
K

Kyle C. Scherr

Researcher at Central Michigan University

Publications -  49
Citations -  771

Kyle C. Scherr is an academic researcher from Central Michigan University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Confession & Waiver. The author has an hindex of 13, co-authored 45 publications receiving 627 citations. Previous affiliations of Kyle C. Scherr include Iowa State University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Potential Roles of Self‐Fulfilling Prophecies, Stigma Consciousness, and Stereotype Threat in Linking Latino/a Ethnicity and Educational Outcomes

TL;DR: This paper explored how these relationships might be mediated by considering several empirically supported and theory-based social psychological processes, such as selffulfilling prophecy, stigma consciousness, and stereotype threat.
Journal ArticleDOI

Using Moral Foundations to Predict Voting Behavior: Regression Models from the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election

TL;DR: This article examined the ability of moral foundations to predict candidate choice in the 2012 U.S. presidential election across three studies and found that moral foundations predicted voting outcomes beyond that predicted by important demographic variables that are traditionally included in election forecasts and research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Self-fulfilling Prophecies: Mechanisms, Power, and Links to Social Problems

TL;DR: Self-fulfilling prophecies as mentioned in this paper occur when perceivers' false beliefs about targets initiate a sequence of events that ultimately cause targets to exhibit expectancy-consistent behaviors, thereby causing the initially false beliefs to become true.
Journal ArticleDOI

Innocence and resisting confession during interrogation: effects on physiologic activity.

TL;DR: It is suggested that innocent suspects underestimate the threat of interrogation and that resisting pressures to confess can diminish suspects' physiologic resources and lead to false confessions.
Journal ArticleDOI

How factors present during the immediate interrogation situation produce short-sighted confession decisions.

TL;DR: Findings suggest that conditions of the immediate interrogation situation may capitalize on an already-present vulnerability among suspects to make short-sighted confession decisions, thereby increasing the chances that even innocent suspects might confess.