Amplification of 16S rRNA genes from culturable and nonculturable mollicutes

RFLP analyses of 16S rDNA nested PCR products from 34 phytoplasma strains with 17 restriction enzymes delineated distinct pattern types. Based on similarity coefficients derived from RFLP analyses, the 34 representative phytoplasma strains were differentiated into 14 major groups (termed 16Sr groups) and 32 sub-groups. The similarity coefficients of RFLP patterns between distinct groups were 90% or below. By including additional groups and sub-groups from which RFLP analyses were not performed but for which 16S rDNA sequence data were available to predict restriction sites, a total of 14 groups and 41 sub-groups were proposed. By combined RFLP analyses of 16S rRNA and ribosomal protein gene sequences, thus far, a total of 46 subgroups have been recognized. The phytoplasma 16Sr groups were consistent with the phylogenetic groups (subclades) defined by phylogenetic analysis of near-full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences, indicating that the RFLP-based groups are phylogenetically valid. The approach using RFLP analyses of PCR-amplified 16S rDNA (and ribosomal protein gene sequences) provides a simple, reliable and rapid means for differentiation and classification of unknown phytoplasmas.

/pdf/revised-classification-scheme-of-phytoplasmas-based-on-rflp-2vahxr066y.pdf

Revised Classification Scheme of Phytoplasmas based on RFLP Analyses of 16S rRNA and Ribosomal Protein Gene Sequences

The trivial name ‘phytoplasma’ has been adopted to collectively name wall-less, non-helical prokaryotes that colonize plant phloem and insects, which were formerly known as mycoplasma-like organisms. Although phytoplasmas have not yet been cultivated in vitro, phylogenetic analyses based on various conserved genes have shown that they represent a distinct, monophyletic clade within the class Mollicutes. It is proposed here to accommodate phytoplasmas within the novel genus ‘Candidatus (Ca.) Phytoplasma’. Given the diversity within ‘Ca. Phytoplasma’, several subtaxa are needed to accommodate organisms that share <97?5 % similarity among their 16S rRNA gene sequences. This report describes the properties of ‘Ca. Phytoplasma’, a taxon that includes the species ‘Ca. Phytoplasma aurantifolia’ (the prokaryote associated with witches’-broom disease of small-fruited acid lime), ‘Ca. Phytoplasma australiense’ (associated with Australian grapevine yellows), ‘Ca. Phytoplasma fraxini’ (associated with ash yellows), ‘Ca. Phytoplasma japonicum’ (associated with Japanese hydrangea phyllody), ‘Ca. Phytoplasma brasiliense’ (associated with hibiscus witches’-broom in Brazil), ‘Ca. Phytoplasma castaneae’ (associated with chestnut witches’-broom in Korea), ‘Ca. Phytoplasma asteris’ (associated with aster yellows), ‘Ca. Phytoplasma mali’ (associated with apple proliferation), ‘Ca. Phytoplasma phoenicium’ (associated with almond lethal disease), ‘Ca. Phytoplasma trifolii’ (associated with clover proliferation), ‘Ca. Phytoplasma cynodontis’ (associated with Bermuda grass white leaf), ‘Ca. Phytoplasma ziziphi’ (associated with jujube witches’-broom), ‘Ca. Phytoplasma oryzae’ (associated with rice yellow dwarf) and six species-level taxa for which the Candidatus species designation has not yet been formally proposed (for the phytoplasmas associated with X-disease of

'Candidatus Phytoplasma', a taxon for the wall-less, non-helical prokaryotes that colonize plant phloem and insects

In order to develop a diagnostic tool to identify phytoplasmas and classify them according to their phylogenetic group, we took advantage of the sequence diversity of the 16S-23S intergenic spacer regions (SRs) of phytoplasmas. Ten PCR primers were developed from the SR sequences and were shown to amplify in a group-specific fashion. For some groups of phytoplasmas, such as elm yellows, ash yellows, and pear decline, the SR primer was paired with a specific primer from within the 16S rRNA gene. Each of these primer pairs was specific for a specific phytoplasma group, and they did not produce PCR products of the correct size from any other phytoplasma group. One primer was designed to anneal within the conserved tRNA(Ile) and, when paired with a universal primer, amplified all phytoplasmas tested. None of the primers produced PCR amplification products of the correct size from healthy plant DNA. These primers can serve as effective tools for identifying particular phytoplasmas in field samples.

Phytoplasma-specific PCR primers based on sequences of the 16S-23S rRNA spacer region.

SUMMARY
Taxonomy: Superkingdom Prokaryota; Kingdom Monera; Domain Bacteria; Phylum Firmicutes (low-G+C, Gram-positive eubacteria); Class Mollicutes; Candidatus (Ca.) genus Phytoplasma.

Host range:  Ca. Phytoplasma comprises approximately 30 distinct clades based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses of ~200 phytoplasmas. Phytoplasmas are mostly dependent on insect transmission for their spread and survival. The phytoplasma life cycle involves replication in insects and plants. They infect the insect but are phloem-limited in plants. Members of Ca. Phytoplasma asteris (16SrI group phytoplasmas) are found in 80 monocot and dicot plant species in most parts of the world. Experimentally, they can be transmitted by approximately 30, frequently polyphagous insect species, to 200 diverse plant species.

Disease symptoms: In plants, phytoplasmas induce symptoms that suggest interference with plant development. Typical symptoms include: witches’ broom (clustering of branches) of developing tissues; phyllody (retrograde metamorphosis of the floral organs to the condition of leaves); virescence (green coloration of non-green flower parts); bolting (growth of elongated stalks); formation of bunchy fibrous secondary roots; reddening of leaves and stems; generalized yellowing, decline and stunting of plants; and phloem necrosis. Phytoplasmas can be pathogenic to some insect hosts, but generally do not negatively affect the fitness of their major insect vector(s). In fact, phytoplasmas can increase fecundity and survival of insect vectors, and may influence flight behaviour and plant host preference of their insect hosts.

Disease control: The most common practices are the spraying of various insecticides to control insect vectors, and removal of symptomatic plants. Phytoplasma-resistant cultivars are not available for the vast majority of affected crops.

/pdf/phytoplasmas-bacteria-that-manipulate-plants-and-insects-1z0jm079tn.pdf

L. N. Chiykowski

Papers

11 – plant diseases associated with mycoplasma-like organisms

Differentiation of MLO diseases by means of symptomatology and vector transmission.