计量经济分析 = Econometric analysis

I NCENTIVES ARE the essence of economics. Despite many wide-ranging claims about their supposed importance, there has been little empirical assessment of incentive provision for workers. The purpose of this paper is to critically overview existing work on the provision of incentives. Since the interests of workers and their employers are not always aligned, a large theoretical literature has emphasized how firms design compensation contracts to induce employees to operate in the firm's interest. This literature has reached into many areas of compensation and has pointed to a multitude of different mechanisms that can be used to induce workers to act in the interests of their employers. These include piece rates, options, discretionary bonuses, promotions, profit sharing, efficiency wages, deferred compensation, and so on. My objective here is to evaluate this literature in the light of a growing empirical literature on compensation. Where possible, I will address the literature from two perspectives. First, an underlying assumption of this literature is that individuals respond to contracts that reward performance. Accordingly, I consider whether agents behave in this way, and whether these responses are always in the firm's interest. Second, I address whether firms write contracts with these responses in mind. In other words, do contracts look like the predictions of the theory? Incentives are provided to workers

/pdf/the-provision-of-incentives-in-firms-zlx7fye09q.pdf

The Provision of Incentives in Firms

This paper studies the flows of funds into and out of equity mutual funds. Consumers base their fund purchase decisions on prior performance information, but do so asymmetrically, investing disproportionately more in funds that performed very well the prior period. Search costs seem to be an important determinant of fund flows. High performance appears to be most salient for funds that exert higher marketing effort, as measured by higher fees. Flows are directly related to the size of the fund's complex as well as the current media attention received by the fund, which lower consumers' search costs.

/pdf/costly-search-and-mutual-fund-flows-kz3fz1kyix.pdf

Costly Search and Mutual Fund Flows

/pdf/the-theory-of-industrial-organization-19bejph0ej.pdf

The Theory of Industrial Organization

This paper surveys the economic literature on boards of directors. Although a legal requirement for many organizations, boards are also an endogenously determined governance mechanism for addressing agency problems inherent to many organizations. Formal theory on boards of directors has been quite limited to this point. Most empirical work on boards has been aimed at answering one of three questions: 1) How are board characteristics such as composition or size related to profitability? 2) How do board characteristics affect the observable actions of the board? 3) What factors affect the makeup of boards and how they evolve over time? The primary findings from the empirical literature on boards are: Board composition is not related to corporate performance, while board size has a negative relation to corporate performance. Both board composition and size are correlated with the board's decisions regarding CEO replacement, acquisitions, poison pills, and executive compensation. Finally, boards appear to evolve over time as a function of the bargaining power of the CEO relative to the existing directors. Firm performance, CEO turnover, and changes in ownership structure appear to be important factors affecting changes to boards.

Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature

We find that institutional ownership concentration is positively related to the pay-for-performance sensitivity of executive compensation and negatively related to the level of compensation, even after controlling for firm size, industry, investment opportunities and performance. These results suggest that the institutions serve a monitoring role in mitigating the agency problem between shareholders and managers. Additionally, we find that clientele effects exist among institutions for firms with certain compensation structures, suggesting that institutions also influence compensation structures through their preferences.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/2451_26645.pdf?abstractid=1294637&mirid=5

Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation

http://mx.nthu.edu.tw/~jtyang/Teaching/Corporate_Governance/Papers/Gillan,%20Stark%202000.pdf

Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: the role of institutional investors

We find that institutional ownership concentration is positively related to the pay-for-performance sensitivity of executive compensation and negatively related to the level of compensation, even after controlling for firm size, industry, investment opportunities, and performance. These results suggest that the institutions serve a monitoring role in mitigating the agency problem between shareholders and managers. Additionally, we find that clientele effects exist among institutions for firms with certain compensation structures, suggesting that institutions also influence compensation structures through their preferences

https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/3648196.pdf

We test the hypothesis that when their compensation is linked to relative performance, managers of investment portfolios likely to end up as “losers” will manipulate fund risk differently than those managing portfolios likely to be “winners.” An empirical investigation of the performance of 334 growth-oriented mutual funds during 1976 to 1991 demonstrates that mid-year losers tend to increase fund volatility in the latter part of an annual assessment period to a greater extent than mid-year winners. Furthermore, we show that this effect became stronger as industry growth and investor awareness of fund performance increased over time.

Of Tournaments and Temptations: An Analysis of Managerial Incentives in the Mutual Fund Industry

We report evidence on chief executive officer (CEO) turnover during the 1971 to 1994 period. We find that the nature of CEO turnover activity has changed over time. The frequencies of forced CEO turnover and outside succession both increased. However, the relation between the likelihood of forced CEO turnover and firm performance did not change significantly from the beginning to the end of the period we examine, despite substantial changes in internal governance mechanisms. The evidence also indicates that changes in the intensity of the takeover market are not associated with changes in the sensitivity of CEO turnover to firm performance. STOCKHOLDERS RELY ON INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL monitoring mechanisms to help resolve agency problems that arise from the separation of ownership and control in modern corporations. Boards of directors and blockholders are important internal control mechanisms whereas the takeover market is a major source of external control. Both academicians and practitioners have speculated that improvements in corporate governance structures would enhance the internal control mechanisms. For example, Jensen (1993) argues that the corporate governance structures of LBO associations and venture capital funds should be models for corporations that desire more efficient control systems. Among the desirable features Jensen points to are smaller, outsider-dominated boards, and substantial equity ownership by managers and board members. Similarly, Blair (1995) discusses corporate governance reformers who advocate changes like those cited by Jensen as well as greater institutional investor involvement in corporate decisions. In addition to pro

https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/2697823.pdf

Laura T. Starks

Papers

Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation

Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: the role of institutional investors

Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation

Of Tournaments and Temptations: An Analysis of Managerial Incentives in the Mutual Fund Industry

Internal Monitoring Mechanisms and CEO Turnover: A Long‐Term Perspective