scispace - formally typeset
L

Lene Gudiksen

Researcher at University of Copenhagen

Publications -  6
Citations -  502

Lene Gudiksen is an academic researcher from University of Copenhagen. The author has contributed to research in topics: Angiotensin-converting enzyme & Biological activity. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 6 publications receiving 472 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Screening of plants used in Danish folk medicine to treat memory dysfunction for acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity

TL;DR: Aqueous and methanolic extracts of 11 plants, used in Danish folk medicine for improvement of memory and cognition, and 3 Corydalis species were tested for acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity using the Ellman colorimetric method.
Journal ArticleDOI

In vitro screening of traditional medicines for anti-hypertensive effect based on inhibition of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE).

TL;DR: Traditional medicines reported to be used as anti-hypertensives or diuretics from different regions in the world (China, India and South America) have been investigated and the crude extracts from seven species inhibit the enzyme by more than 50%.
Journal ArticleDOI

An ethnopharmacological survey for potential angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors from Indian medicinal plants

TL;DR: Out of the 73 species investigated, 22 showed more than 50% ACE inhibitory activity, and they were selected on the basis of their usage as cardiotonics, diuretics and other uses related to the symptoms of hypertension.
Journal ArticleDOI

Screening of plants used in Danish folk medicine to treat epilepsy and convulsions.

TL;DR: Aqueous and ethanolic extracts of 42 plants used in Danish folk medicine for the treatment of epilepsy and convulsions, or for inducing sedation, tested for affinity to the GABA(A)-benzodiazepine receptor in the flumazenil-binding assay.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparative studies in phytochemistry and fruit anatomy of Thapsia garganica and T. transtagana, Apiaceae (Umbelliferae)

TL;DR: Significant differences between the two taxa with regard to fruit anatomy and phytochemistry are demonstrated and they are considered as two separate species.