scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Leslie G. Ford published in 1996"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This study shows that the NCIclinical trials are, as a whole, racially/ethnically representative of the American population and suggests that there is equal access to NCI clinical trials.
Abstract: Background : The National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored clinical trials cooperative groups place more than 25 000 American patients in treatment trials every year. Equal access and proportional representation of all races/ethnicities is desired. Purpose : Our objectives were to evaluate the inclusion of African-Americans, Hispanics, and non-Hispanic whites in NCI-sponsored treatment trials and to determine if there is proportional racial/ethnic representation. Methods : During the period of January 1, 1991, through June 30, 1994, 99 495 cancer patients were enrolled in clinical trials and declared themselves as non-Hispanic black, non-Hispanic white, or Hispanic (of any race). In the analysis, participants in NCI treatment trials were subdivided into three age groups : birth to 19 years, 20-49 years, and 50 or more years. The racial/ethnic composition of each of these age groups was compared with the racial/ethnic makeup of the American population with cancer. Estimates of the number of incident cancer cases per year were made for each racial/ethnic group within each age group using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program and the 1990 Census. The percentage of all cancer patients who were in each racial/ethnic group were compared with the population that entered clinical trials. Comparisons are also made separately for patients with leukemia and breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers. Results : Among patients 0-19 years old, 20-49 years old, and 50 years old or older there is relatively proportional representation of non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, and non-Hispanic whites in trials. It is noted that more than 70% of cancer patients aged 0-19 years are estimated to enter cooperative group clinical trials compared with 4.0% of cancer patients aged 20-49 years and 1.5% of patients aged 50 years or older. Conclusions : Accrual of American cancer patients to NCI-sponsored treatment trials generally parallels the incident burden of disease among non-Hispanic African-Americans, Hispanics, and non-Hispanic whites. Implications : This study shows that the NCI clinical trials are, as a whole, racially/ethnically representative of the American population and suggests that there is equal access to NCI clinical trials.

265 citations


Journal Article
TL;DR: Physician and practice setting characteristics, including organized structures such as the CCOP, are possible mediating structures that can facilitate dissemination of standards of treatment.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE. This article compares judgments about the treatment of Dukes' B2 and C colon cancer made by general surgeons to those of internists and family practitioners. Physician and practice variables were specialty, affiliation with a Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP) hospital, time in practice, professional centrality (level of participation in cancer information networks), solo practice, and number of colon cancer patients. DATA COLLECTION METHODS. Data are combined from national probability samples of CCOP- and non-CCOP-affiliated physicians. This study focused on 1,138 internists, family physicians, and general surgeons who participated in decision making for patients diagnosed with Dukes' B2 or C stage colon cancer. Judgments were elicited using brief vignettes. METHODS OF ANALYSIS. Judgments of adjuvant therapy are classified as (a) consistent with the National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference recommendations (experimental for Dukes' B2, accepted for Dukes' C); (b) accepted treatment for both stages; or (c) experimental for both stages. Multinomial logit analyses were used to examine the association of practice setting and physician characteristics to judgments of treatment. RESULTS. Surgeons and CCOP-affiliated physicians were more likely to endorse the NIH consensus conference position. Surgeons, younger physicians, and those in group practice were more likely to approve of chemotherapy for both cancer stages. The most common position (chemotherapy experimental) was more likely from nonsurgeons, solo practitioners, and non-CCOP physicians. CONCLUSION. Physician and practice setting characteristics, including organized structures such as the CCOP, are possible mediating structures that can facilitate dissemination of standards of treatment.

23 citations