L
Lissa Dutra
Researcher at Boston University
Publications - 7
Citations - 2754
Lissa Dutra is an academic researcher from Boston University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Psychometrics & Dissociative disorders. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 7 publications receiving 2529 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
A Multidimensional Meta-Analysis of Psychotherapy for PTSD.
TL;DR: The majority of patients treated with psychotherapy for PTSD in randomized trials recover or improve, rendering these approaches some of the most effective psychosocial treatments devised to date.
Journal ArticleDOI
A multidimensional meta-analysis of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder.
TL;DR: A multidimensional meta-analysis of psychological and pharmacological treatment studies for OCD published between 1980 and 2001 is reported, examining a range of variables not previously meta-analyzed, including exclusion rates and exclusion criteria, percent of patients improved or recovered post- treatment, mean post-treatment symptomatology, and long-term outcome.
Journal ArticleDOI
From Infant Attachment Disorganization to Adult Dissociation: Relational Adaptations or Traumatic Experiences?
TL;DR: As one offshoot of attachment studies, developmental theorists and researchers have begun to explore the role of early childhood attachment and parenting in the etiology and development of dissociative symptomatology.
Journal ArticleDOI
Quality of Early Care and Childhood Trauma: A Prospective Study of Developmental Pathways to Dissociation
TL;DR: Regression analysis indicated that dissociation in young adulthood was significantly predicted by observed lack of parental responsiveness in infancy, while childhood verbal abuse was the only type of trauma that added to the prediction of dissociation.
Journal ArticleDOI
Quantifying clinical judgment in the assessment of adolescent psychopathology: Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Child Behavior Checklist for clinician report.
TL;DR: The data suggest that clinical judgment can be both reliable and valid when quantified using psychometrically sound instruments.