ABCD
: Appropriate Blood pressure Control in Diabetes
ABI
: ankle–brachial index
ABPM
: ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
ACCESS
: Acute Candesartan Cilexetil Therapy in Stroke Survival
ACCOMPLISH
: Avoiding Cardiovascular Events in Combination Therapy in Patients Living with Systolic Hypertension
ACCORD
: Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes
ACE
: angiotensin-converting enzyme
ACTIVE I
: Atrial Fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for Prevention of Vascular Events
ADVANCE
: Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron-MR Controlled Evaluation
AHEAD
: Action for HEAlth in Diabetes
ALLHAT
: Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart ATtack
ALTITUDE
: ALiskiren Trial In Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-renal Endpoints
ANTIPAF
: ANgioTensin II Antagonist In Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
APOLLO
: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Aliskiren in the Prevention of Major Cardiovascular Events in Elderly People
ARB
: angiotensin receptor blocker
ARIC
: Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities
ARR
: aldosterone renin ratio
ASCOT
: Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial
ASCOT-LLA
: Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial—Lipid Lowering Arm
ASTRAL
: Angioplasty and STenting for Renal Artery Lesions
A-V
: atrioventricular
BB
: beta-blocker
BMI
: body mass index
BP
: blood pressure
BSA
: body surface area
CA
: calcium antagonist
CABG
: coronary artery bypass graft
CAPPP
: CAPtopril Prevention Project
CAPRAF
: CAndesartan in the Prevention of Relapsing Atrial Fibrillation
CHD
: coronary heart disease
CHHIPS
: Controlling Hypertension and Hypertension Immediately Post-Stroke
CKD
: chronic kidney disease
CKD-EPI
: Chronic Kidney Disease—EPIdemiology collaboration
CONVINCE
: Controlled ONset Verapamil INvestigation of CV Endpoints
CT
: computed tomography
CV
: cardiovascular
CVD
: cardiovascular disease
D
: diuretic
DASH
: Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension
DBP
: diastolic blood pressure
DCCT
: Diabetes Control and Complications Study
DIRECT
: DIabetic REtinopathy Candesartan Trials
DM
: diabetes mellitus
DPP-4
: dipeptidyl peptidase 4
EAS
: European Atherosclerosis Society
EASD
: European Association for the Study of Diabetes
ECG
: electrocardiogram
EF
: ejection fraction
eGFR
: estimated glomerular filtration rate
ELSA
: European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis
ESC
: European Society of Cardiology
ESH
: European Society of Hypertension
ESRD
: end-stage renal disease
EXPLOR
: Amlodipine–Valsartan Combination Decreases Central Systolic Blood Pressure more Effectively than the Amlodipine–Atenolol Combination
FDA
: U.S. Food and Drug Administration
FEVER
: Felodipine EVent Reduction study
GISSI-AF
: Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico-Atrial Fibrillation
HbA1c
: glycated haemoglobin
HBPM
: home blood pressure monitoring
HOPE
: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation
HOT
: Hypertension Optimal Treatment
HRT
: hormone replacement therapy
HT
: hypertension
HYVET
: HYpertension in the Very Elderly Trial
IMT
: intima-media thickness
I-PRESERVE
: Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Systolic Function
INTERHEART
: Effect of Potentially Modifiable Risk Factors associated with Myocardial Infarction in 52 Countries
INVEST
: INternational VErapamil SR/T Trandolapril
ISH
: Isolated systolic hypertension
JNC
: Joint National Committee
JUPITER
: Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin
LAVi
: left atrial volume index
LIFE
: Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertensives
LV
: left ventricle/left ventricular
LVH
: left ventricular hypertrophy
LVM
: left ventricular mass
MDRD
: Modification of Diet in Renal Disease
MRFIT
: Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial
MRI
: magnetic resonance imaging
NORDIL
: The Nordic Diltiazem Intervention study
OC
: oral contraceptive
OD
: organ damage
ONTARGET
: ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial
PAD
: peripheral artery disease
PATHS
: Prevention And Treatment of Hypertension Study
PCI
: percutaneous coronary intervention
PPAR
: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
PREVEND
: Prevention of REnal and Vascular ENdstage Disease
PROFESS
: Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Secondary Strokes
PROGRESS
: Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study
PWV
: pulse wave velocity
QALY
: Quality adjusted life years
RAA
: renin-angiotensin-aldosterone
RAS
: renin-angiotensin system
RCT
: randomized controlled trials
RF
: risk factor
ROADMAP
: Randomized Olmesartan And Diabetes MicroAlbuminuria Prevention
SBP
: systolic blood pressure
SCAST
: Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker Candesartan for Treatment of Acute STroke
SCOPE
: Study on COgnition and Prognosis in the Elderly
SCORE
: Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation
SHEP
: Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program
STOP
: Swedish Trials in Old Patients with Hypertension
STOP-2
: The second Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension
SYSTCHINA
: SYSTolic Hypertension in the Elderly: Chinese trial
SYSTEUR
: SYSTolic Hypertension in Europe
TIA
: transient ischaemic attack
TOHP
: Trials Of Hypertension Prevention
TRANSCEND
: Telmisartan Randomised AssessmeNt Study in ACE iNtolerant subjects with cardiovascular Disease
UKPDS
: United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study
VADT
: Veterans' Affairs Diabetes Trial
VALUE
: Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation
WHO
: World Health Organization

### 1.1 Principles

The 2013 guidelines on hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology …

/pdf/2013-esh-esc-guidelines-for-the-management-of-arterial-4ydvs5ifsx.pdf

2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.

https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/preview/1797952/1-s2.0-S0140673618322797-main.pdf

Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/164632/2/01_Bin%2bSayeed_Global%252C_regional%252C_and_national_2018.pdf

Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, andyears lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematicanalysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017

Because of new evidence on several diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of hypertension, the present guidelines differ in many respects from the previous ones. Some of the most important differences are listed below: 
1. Epidemiological data on hypertension and BP control in Europe. 
2. Strengthening of the prognostic value of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) and of its role for diagnosis and management of hypertension, next to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). 
3. Update of the prognostic significance of night-time BP, white-coat hypertension and masked hypertension. 
4. Re-emphasis on integration of BP, cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, asymptomatic organ damage (OD) and clinical complications for total CV risk assessment. 
5. Update of the prognostic significance of asymptomatic OD, including heart, blood vessels, kidney, eye and brain. 
6. Reconsideration of the risk of overweight and target body mass index (BMI) in hypertension. 
7. Hypertension in young people. 
8. Initiation of antihypertensive treatment. More evidence-based criteria and no drug treatment of high normal BP. 
9. Target BP for treatment. More evidence-based criteria and unified target systolic blood pressure (SBP) (<140 mmHg) in both higher and lower CV risk patients. 
10. Liberal approach to initial monotherapy, without any all-ranking purpose. 
11. Revised schema for priorital two-drug combinations. 
12. New therapeutic algorithms for achieving target BP. 
13. Extended section on therapeutic strategies in special conditions. 
14. Revised recommendations on treatment of hypertension in the elderly. 
15. Drug treatment of octogenarians. 
16. Special attention to resistant hypertension and new treatment approaches. 
17. Increased attention to OD-guided therapy. 
18. New approaches to chronic management of hypertensive disease

/pdf/2013-esh-esc-guidelines-for-the-management-of-arterial-4eubk4p0u3.pdf

2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

Costi dell’infarto miocardico acuto: analisi di dati sanitari amministrativi

In this study we compare the cost-effectiveness of saxagliptin (Onglyza®) in combination with metformin to that of either sulphonylurea (SU) plus metformin or a thiazolidinedione  (TZD) plus metformin, in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients who are not well-controlled on metformin alone. By using decision-analytic modeling, long-term costs and health outcomes associated with the investigated treatment strategies are estimated. This is achieved by modeling the risk of experiencing diabetes-related events (e.g. myocardial infarction) or side-effects such as hypoglycemia and weight gain. The risk of these events  depends on baseline characteristics as well as risk factors (which can be altered by the treatment strategies). Ultimately, costs (NHS perspective) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for each treatment strategy are based on the occurrence of these events. Based on these estimates incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (cost per QALYs) are calculated. In the analysis comparing saxagliptin + metformin with SU + metformin in 1,000 patients in a 40 years time horizon, the total QALY gain with saxagliptin + metformin is 111. The incremental cost with saxagliptin + metformin is € 1,300,000, resulting in a total cost per QALY gained with saxagliptin + metformin of € 11,800 in the base case scenario. Similarly, the comparison with TZD + metformin resulted in a total  QALY gain with saxagliptin + metformin of 127, with an incremental cost of € 144,000, resulting in a total cost per QALY gained with saxagliptin + metformin of € 1,100 in the base case scenario. The results are mainly driven by differences in hypoglycemias (associated with a utility decrement and a monetary cost) and weight gain (which is associated with a utility decrement and also increases the risk for diabetes-related events). Saxagliptin + metformin is associated with small difference in macrovascular events such as myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure compared to SU or TZD plus metformin strategies, probably due to the difference of action on net weight. Since the treatment cost is higher with saxagliptin + metformin, total costs are also higher for the Onglyza®-based strategy although the higher drug cost is partially offset by the lower rate of macrovascular costs and reduced cost of severe hypoglycemias. The present analysis suggests that saxagliptin, when added to metformin, is a cost-effective treatment alternative for type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in Italy who are not well-controlled on metformin alone. Both compared to SU + metformin and TZD + metformin, the cost-effectiveness results of saxagliptin + metformin are robust to various assumptions concerning input variables. Hence, the favorable safety profile for saxagliptin, with a risk of hypoglycemia and impact on weight similar to placebo, makes it possible to increase the utility for patients since it is not reducing risk of diabetes-related events per se.

/pdf/economic-evaluation-of-the-use-of-saxagliptin-in-the-14xoo1462t.pdf

Economic evaluation of the use of saxagliptin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Italy

Phl4 cost of care and quality of life in hemophiliacs developing inhibitors against products of coagulation: the cocis study

Pih7 quality of life of italian general population aged 40 to 79 years old

Background Chronic rheumatic conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are associated with severe morbidity and significant impairment of patients9 health related quality of life (HRQoL). Several treatments are available but not all the patients respond positively to them. Biologic therapies such as anti-TNFα agents are shown to benefit who fail or have partial responses to standard DMARD therapy. Objectives Within a multicenter stated preferences study (CARA Study), we assessed HRQoL in patients with RA, AS and PsA, and estimated relationship of HRQOL with the different diagnoses, clinical characteristics and biological treatment experience. Methods Patients with RA, AS, or PsA, who at the time of enrollment were following a treatment (experienced) or received a first prescription (naive) of treatment with biological drugs were enrolled. Together with preferences data, clinical and HRQOL information was reported. HRQoL was assessed with the recently developed and successfully validated version of the EQ-5D-5L, which allows to obtain a description of health (in 5 domains and 5 levels of severity each), a measure (EQ-VAS) and a valuation (utility) of health. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between EQ-5D VAS score and the utility with age, sex, diagnosis, treatment experience, years from symptoms onset and years from diagnosis. Results 513 patients were enrolled (mean±SD =50.0±13.6, 42.5% female). As regards the diagnosis, 33.9% had RA, 34.9% PsA and 31.2% AS. The mean±SD time from the symptoms onset was 10.8±9.4 and from the diagnosis was 8.0±8.2 years. Almost half of the patients (47.4%) were naive to the biological treatment. Patients reporting severe or extreme problems were: 7.1% in mobility, 3.6% in self-care, 10.3% in usual activities, 18.6% in pain/discomfort, 5.5% in anxiety/depression. The mean±SD of the VAS was 60.4±20.5 and of the utility was 0.773±0.116. From the regression model the VAS and utility are significantly (p Conclusions Patients naive to biological treatment have significat lower levels of HRQoL, suggesting that their current situation is not satisfactory and need to start with a more effective treatment. Disclosure of Interest L. Sinigaglia: None declared, L. Scalone: None declared, P. Sarzi-Puttini: None declared, C. Montecucco: None declared, R. Giacomelli Grant/research support from: MSD, G. Lapadula: None declared, I. Olivieri: None declared, A. Giardino Employee of: MSD Italia, G. Didoni Employee of: MSD Italia, P. Cortesi Grant/research support from: Gilead, L. Mantovani: None declared, M. Mecchia Employee of: MSD Italia

https://ard.bmj.com/content/annrheumdis/76/Suppl_2/1533.1.full.pdf

AB1203-HPR Comparison of quality of life of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankilosing spondilitis with treatment or prescription of biologic drugs: results from the cara study

Lorenzo G. Mantovani

Papers

Costi dell’infarto miocardico acuto: analisi di dati sanitari amministrativi

Economic evaluation of the use of saxagliptin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Italy

Phl4 cost of care and quality of life in hemophiliacs developing inhibitors against products of coagulation: the cocis study

Pih7 quality of life of italian general population aged 40 to 79 years old

AB1203-HPR Comparison of quality of life of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankilosing spondilitis with treatment or prescription of biologic drugs: results from the cara study