L
Louise Archer
Researcher at Institute of Education
Publications - 151
Citations - 10276
Louise Archer is an academic researcher from Institute of Education. The author has contributed to research in topics: Science education & Higher education. The author has an hindex of 49, co-authored 143 publications receiving 8914 citations. Previous affiliations of Louise Archer include University College London & University of North London.
Papers
More filters
Book
Higher Education and Social Class: Issues of Exclusion and Inclusion
TL;DR: In this article, the Robbins Report on Higher Education and Social Class and Higher Education has been used to support Widening participation in HE: Implications for Policy and Practice, and Widening Participation in Higher Education: Widening Access to Higher Education.
Journal ArticleDOI
"Doing" Science versus "Being" a Scientist: Examining 10/11-Year-Old Schoolchildren's Constructions of Science through the Lens of Identity.
TL;DR: For instance, this article found that the majority of young children have positive attitudes to science at age 10 but this interest then declines sharply and by age 14, their attitude and interest in the study of science has been largely formed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Challenging Cultures? Student Conceptions of 'Belonging' and 'Isolation' at a Post-1992 University
TL;DR: The authors explored the extent to which students can challenge their positioning as 'other' by choosing a university where they feel they can 'belong' and the extent of institutional academic cultures work to constrain and disrupt such feelings of belonging.
Journal ArticleDOI
Science Aspirations, Capital, and Family Habitus How Families Shape Children’s Engagement and Identification With Science
TL;DR: The authors explored how the interplay of family habitus and capital can make science aspirations more "thinkable" for some (notably middle-class) children than others, and argued that social inequalities in the distribution of capital and diff...
Journal ArticleDOI
Younger academics’ constructions of ‘authenticity’, ‘success’ and professional identity
TL;DR: In this article, it is argued that younger academics' experiences of inauthenticity are exacerbated by: (a) the current dominant performative ethos, (b) their age, (c) race, class, gender and status, but especially for those who are contract researchers.