scispace - formally typeset
L

Love Ekenberg

Researcher at Stockholm University

Publications -  216
Citations -  2424

Love Ekenberg is an academic researcher from Stockholm University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Decision analysis & Optimal decision. The author has an hindex of 23, co-authored 208 publications receiving 2196 citations. Previous affiliations of Love Ekenberg include Royal Institute of Technology & Mid Sweden University.

Papers
More filters
Journal Article

Exploring the e-Learning State of Art

TL;DR: This research presents a meta-modelling framework that automates the very labor-intensive and therefore time-heavy and therefore expensive process of manually cataloging and cataloging individual students' learning styles and activities.
Journal ArticleDOI

State-of-the-Art Prescriptive Criteria Weight Elicitation

TL;DR: This paper provides a survey of state-of-the-art weight elicitation methods in a prescriptive setting and suggests several techniques for deriving criteria weights from preference statements.
Journal ArticleDOI

A framework for evaluation of flood management strategies

TL;DR: Based on the policy strategies in the Tisza case, data is extracted from the strategies and a framework for loss spread in developing and emerging economies is proposed and can straightforwardly be included in a simulation and decision model for policy formulation and evaluation.
Journal ArticleDOI

A framework for analysing decisions under risk

TL;DR: The approach allows the decision maker to be as deliberately imprecise as he feels is natural and provides him with the means for expressing varying degrees of imprecision in the input sentences.
Journal ArticleDOI

Open Government and Democracy

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors constructed a framework for the analysis of open government from a democratic perspective, to explore the research foundation of Open Government and the types of research missing. But despite good intentions and an extensive rhetoric, there is still an apparent lack of adequate tools in which public deliberation and representation are addressed in any meaningful sense.