Showing papers by "Lyndon Jones published in 1996"

Spoilation and clinical performance of monthly vs. three monthly Group II disposable contact lenses.

Abstract: Twelve subjects were fitted with a high water content, nonionic contact lens (Pilkington Barnes-Hind "Precision UV"), which was either replaced every month for 3 months or worn for 3 consecutive months before replacement occurred. Visual quality, high and low contrast acuity, and comfort were unaltered with either replacement schedule, but overall satisfaction was significantly greater with the shorter replacement schedule (p = 0.04). Front surface wettability revealed a large amount of intersubject variability and was reduced at the 3-month visit with the longer replacement period lenses (p = 0.003). Visible deposits also increased with longer replacement times (p < 0.05). Laboratory-based analytical results showed that both gross lipid and gross extractable protein significantly increased in the 3-month lenses compared with the 1-month lenses, with 44% less lipid accumulation and 60% less protein deposition occurring with the shorter replacement time. The results support the replacement of high water content lenses on a monthly basis.

Life expectancy of rigid gas permeable and high water content contact lenses.

Abstract: PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the life expectancy of various rigid gas permeable (RGP) lens materials used on a daily wear basis and to compare these results with the life expectancy of a matched group of soft lens wearers. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 600 contact lens wearing patients (300 soft contact lens users and 300 RGP lens users fit between September 1987 and September 1994. None of the subjects wore lenses on a planned replacement system. For the purpose of the study, RGP lenses were divided into three groups: or = 90 Dk were considered high-Dk. All soft lenses were high water content lenses (> or = 60% water content). Lenses were included if they were replaced due to loss, breakage, deposition, or poor wettability but not if replaced because of changes in fit or prescription. RESULTS: The mean (+/- SD) life-spans of each lens type in months were 19.9 +/- 17 for low-Dk RGP lenses, 15.9 +/- 13.3 for mid-Dk RGP lenses, 9.0 +/- 8.2 for high-Dk RGP lenses, and 6.4 +/- 5.2 for high water content soft lenses. Statistical analysis using a one-way ANOVA on ranks indicated that these results were statistically significant (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients should be informed that high-Dk lenses (RGP and soft) provide substantial clinical benefits and that they should except to replace high-Dk RGP lenses after approximately 6 months. This lends further credence to the use of high-Dk lenses on a planned replacement basis.

Reactive or proactive contact lens fitting make a difference? does it

Abstract: Four practitioners each noted the details of 40 successive non-contact lens-wearing patients who consulted them for a routine eye examination. The subjects were divided into two equal groups. In the first group contact lenses were only discussed if the subjects solicited the discussion and in the other group subjects were actively encouraged to try contact lenses. Interested subjects were fitted with a monthly disposable lens and dismissed for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks the patients were asked if they would like to continue with lenses, which they would subsequently have to pay for. Approximately six times more contact lens patients were fitted with contact lenses by adopting a proactive approach. ~YWORDS: Disposable contact lenses, monovision