Background and Purpose—The authors present an overview of the current evidence and management recommendations for evaluation and treatment of adults with acute ischemic stroke. The intended audienc...

/pdf/guidelines-for-the-early-management-of-patients-with-acute-19udbft6e7.pdf

Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

BACKGROUND. Balloon-expandable coronary-artery stents were developed to prevent coronary restenosis after coronary angioplasty. These devices hold coronary vessels open at sites that have been dilated. However, it is unknown whether stenting improves long-term angiographic and clinical outcomes as compared with standard balloon angioplasty. METHODS. A total of 520 patients with stable angina and a single coronary-artery lesion were randomly assigned to either stent implantation (262 patients) or standard balloon angioplasty (258 patients). The primary clinical end points were death, the occurrence of a cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, the need for coronary-artery bypass surgery, or a second percutaneous intervention involving the previously treated lesion, either at the time of the initial procedure or during the subsequent seven months. The primary angiographic end point was the minimal luminal diameter at follow-up, as determined by quantitative coronary angiography. RESULTS. After exclusions, 52 patients in the stent group (20 percent) and 76 patients in the angioplasty group (30 percent) reached a primary clinical end point (relative risk, 0.68; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.50 to 0.92; P = 0.02). The difference in clinical-event rates was explained mainly by a reduced need for a second coronary angioplasty in the stent group (relative risk, 0.58; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.85; P = 0.005). The mean (+/- SD) minimal luminal diameters immediately after the procedure were 2.48 +/- 0.39 mm in the stent group and 2.05 +/- 0.33 mm in the angioplasty group; at follow-up, the diameters were 1.82 +/- 0.64 mm in the stent group and 1.73 +/- 0.55 mm in the angioplasty group (P = 0.09), which correspond to rates of restenosis (diameter of stenosis, > or = 50 percent) of 22 and 32 percent, respectively (P = 0.02). Peripheral vascular complications necessitating surgery, blood transfusion, or both were more frequent after stenting than after balloon angioplasty (13.5 vs. 3.1 percent, P < 0.001). The mean hospital stay was significantly longer in the stent group than in the angioplasty group (8.5 vs. 3.1 days, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS. Over seven months of follow-up, the clinical and angiographic outcomes were better in patients who received a stent than in those who received standard coronary angioplasty. However, this benefit was achieved at the cost of a significantly higher risk of vascular complications at the access site and a longer hospital stay.

/pdf/a-comparison-of-balloon-expandable-stent-implantation-with-3adajz0chr.pdf

A Comparison of Balloon-Expandable-Stent Implantation with Balloon Angioplasty in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Background and Purpose- The purpose of these guidelines is to provide an up-to-date comprehensive set of recommendations in a single document for clinicians caring for adult patients with acute arterial ischemic stroke. The intended audiences are prehospital care providers, physicians, allied health professionals, and hospital administrators. These guidelines supersede the 2013 Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) Guidelines and are an update of the 2018 AIS Guidelines. Methods- Members of the writing group were appointed by the American Heart Association (AHA) Stroke Council's Scientific Statements Oversight Committee, representing various areas of medical expertise. Members were not allowed to participate in discussions or to vote on topics relevant to their relations with industry. An update of the 2013 AIS Guidelines was originally published in January 2018. This guideline was approved by the AHA Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee and the AHA Executive Committee. In April 2018, a revision to these guidelines, deleting some recommendations, was published online by the AHA. The writing group was asked review the original document and revise if appropriate. In June 2018, the writing group submitted a document with minor changes and with inclusion of important newly published randomized controlled trials with >100 participants and clinical outcomes at least 90 days after AIS. The document was sent to 14 peer reviewers. The writing group evaluated the peer reviewers' comments and revised when appropriate. The current final document was approved by all members of the writing group except when relationships with industry precluded members from voting and by the governing bodies of the AHA. These guidelines use the American College of Cardiology/AHA 2015 Class of Recommendations and Level of Evidence and the new AHA guidelines format. Results- These guidelines detail prehospital care, urgent and emergency evaluation and treatment with intravenous and intra-arterial therapies, and in-hospital management, including secondary prevention measures that are appropriately instituted within the first 2 weeks. The guidelines support the overarching concept of stroke systems of care in both the prehospital and hospital settings. Conclusions- These guidelines provide general recommendations based on the currently available evidence to guide clinicians caring for adult patients with acute arterial ischemic stroke. In many instances, however, only limited data exist demonstrating the urgent need for continued research on treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

ContextIntravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator can be beneficial to some
patients when given within 3 hours of stroke onset, but many patients present
later after stroke onset and alternative treatments are needed.ObjectiveTo determine the clinical efficacy and safety of intra-arterial (IA)
recombinant prourokinase (r-proUK) in patients with acute stroke of less than
6 hours' duration caused by middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion.DesignPROACT II (Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism II), a randomized,
controlled, multicenter, open-label clinical trial with blinded follow-up
conducted between February 1996 and August 1998.SettingFifty-four centers in the United States and Canada.PatientsA total of 180 patients with acute ischemic stroke of less than 6 hours'
duration caused by angiographically proven occlusion of the MCA and without
hemorrhage or major early infarction signs on computed tomographic scan.InterventionPatients were randomized to receive 9 mg of IA r-proUK plus heparin
(n = 121) or heparin only (n = 59).Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome, analyzed by intention-to-treat, was based on the
proportion of patients with slight or no neurological disability at 90 days
as defined by a modified Rankin score of 2 or less. Secondary outcomes included
MCA recanalization, the frequency of intracranial hemorrhage with neurological
deterioration, and mortality.ResultsFor the primary analysis, 40% of r-proUK patients and 25% of control
patients had a modified Rankin score of 2 or less (P
= .04). Mortality was 25% for the r-proUK group and 27% for the control group.
The recanalization rate was 66% for the r-proUK group and 18% for the control
group (P<.001). Intracranial hemorrhage with neurological
deterioration within 24 hours occurred in 10% of r-proUK patients and 2% of
control patients (P = .06).ConclusionDespite an increased frequency of early symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage,
treatment with IA r-proUK within 6 hours of the onset of acute ischemic stroke
caused by MCA occlusion significantly improved clinical outcome at 90 days.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/192156/JOC91323.pdf

M. A. Greenberg

Papers

The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings