Flow displacement systems are superior to many other (static) systems for studying microbial adhesion to surfaces because mass transport and prevailing shear conditions can be adequately controlled and notoriously ill-defined slight rinsing steps to remove so-called “loosely adhering organisms” can be avoided. In this review, we present the basic background required to calculate mass transport and shear rates in flow displacement systems, focusing on the parallel plate flow chamber as an example. Critical features in the design of flow displacement systems are discussed, as well as different strategies for data analysis. Finally, selected examples of working with flow displacement systems are given for diverse biomedical applications.

/pdf/microbial-adhesion-in-flow-displacement-systems-274tdexi34.pdf

Microbial Adhesion in Flow Displacement Systems

Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation on different gentamicin-loaded polymethylmethacrylate bone cements.

Flow chambers are commonly used to study microbial adhesion to surfaces under environmentally relevant hydrodynamic conditions. The parallel plate flow chamber (PPFC) is the most common design, and mass transport occurs through slow convective diffusion. In this study, we analyzed four different PPFCs to determine whether the expected hydrodynamic conditions, which control both mass transport and detachment forces, are actually achieved. Furthermore, the different PPFCs were critically evaluated based on the size of the area where the velocity profile was established and constant with a range of flow rates, indicating that valid observations could be made. Velocity profiles in the different chambers were calculated by using a numerical simulation model based on the finite element method and were found to coincide with the profiles measured by particle image velocimetry. Environmentally relevant shear rates between 0 and 10,000 s 1 could be measured over a sizeable proportion of the substratum surface for only two of the four PPFCs. Two models appeared to be flawed in the design of their inlets and outlets and allowed development of a stable velocity profile only for shear rates up to 0.5 and 500 s 1 . For these PPFCs the inlet and outlet were curved, and the modeled shear rates deviated from the calculated shear rates by up to 75%. We concluded that PPFCs used for studies of microbial adhesion to surfaces should be designed so that their inlets and outlets are in line with the flow channel. Alternatively, the channel length should be increased to allow a greater length for the establishment of the desired hydrodynamic conditions.

https://www.rug.nl/research/biomaterials/publications/presentations/hjb5/bakker_aem68%282003%296280-6287.pdf

Comparison of velocity profiles for different flow chamber designs used in studies of microbial adhesion to surfaces.

Three different methods to standardize biofilm removal for in situ sanitary control of closed surfaces in the food industry have been developed and compared, i.e. sonication, enzymatic treatment and a combined treatment which involved the application of ultrasound to enzyme preparations. The biofilm studied was an Escherichia coli model biofilm, made with milk on stainless steel sheets. Plate counting and epifluorescence microscopy were used to assess the efficiency of each treatment. The results are expressed in percentages, 100% denoting total removal, obtained with a flat ultrasonic transducer (T1) developed and presented in a previous study. The application of ultrasound by a patented curved transducer, T2 (10 s, 40 kHz), specifically devised for closed surfaces, was not sufficient to completely remove the biofilm (30 ± 7%). This biofilm was dislodged by two proteolytic enzyme preparations tested by immersion, viz. a 15‐min application of protease (84±1%) and a 30‐min trypsin application (95±8%). Usin...

"Escherichia coli-milk" biofilm removal from stainless steel surfaces: synergism between ultrasonic waves and enzymes.

Interactions of 1 μm latex particles with pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms

Deposition rates of Pseudomonas putida and Hyphomicrobium ZV620 onto glass and biofilm surfaces were quantified. Both species deposited to glass at a much slower rate than to biofilm. A definite bias by depositing cells for biofilms of their own species was evident in the highest attachment rates observed in this study.

M. Katherine Banks

Papers

Deposition of bacterial cells onto glass and biofilm surfaces