scispace - formally typeset
M

Madhukar Pai

Researcher at McGill University

Publications -  557
Citations -  38163

Madhukar Pai is an academic researcher from McGill University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Tuberculosis & Tuberculosis diagnosis. The author has an hindex of 89, co-authored 522 publications receiving 33349 citations. Previous affiliations of Madhukar Pai include Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences & Sundaram Medical Foundation.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Systematic review: T-cell-based assays for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection: an update.

TL;DR: An updated meta-analysis of 38 studies found that sensitivity of IGRAs and TST was not consistent across tests and populations, but TSPOT.TB seemed to be more sensitive than QuantiFERON tests and T ST.
Journal ArticleDOI

Xpert® MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults.

TL;DR: This updated Cochrane Review on the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert® MTB/RIF for pulmonary TB and rifampicin resistance detection was performed as part of a WHO process to develop updated guidelines on the use of the test.
Journal ArticleDOI

Meta-analysis: new tests for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection: areas of uncertainty and recommendations for research.

TL;DR: New IGRAs have good specificity and show promise for detecting latent TB, particularly in BCG-vaccinated patients, and in the past decade, 2 new T-cellbased tests for diagnosing latent TB infection have been developed and licensed for commercial distribution in many countries.
Journal ArticleDOI

Interferon-γ assays in the immunodiagnosis of tuberculosis: a systematic review

TL;DR: In this article, the authors did a systematic review to assess the performance of interferon-γ assays in the immunodiagnosis of tuberculosis, and they found that using Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific region of difference 1 (RD1) antigens (such as early secretory antigenic target 6 and culture filtrate protein 10) may have advantages over the TST, in terms of higher specificity, better correlation with exposure to M tuberculosis and less cross-reactivity due to BCG vaccination and non-tuberculous mycob
Journal ArticleDOI

Fluorescence versus conventional sputum smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic review.

TL;DR: The results suggest that, overall, fluorescence microscopy is more sensitive than conventional microscopy, and has similar specificity, and there is insufficient evidence to determine the value of fluorescence microscopeopy in HIV-infected individuals.