M
Maria Hartwig
Researcher at John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Publications - 59
Citations - 3820
Maria Hartwig is an academic researcher from John Jay College of Criminal Justice. The author has contributed to research in topics: Deception & Lie detection. The author has an hindex of 32, co-authored 59 publications receiving 3410 citations. Previous affiliations of Maria Hartwig include City University of New York & University of Gothenburg.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Why Do Lie-Catchers Fail? A Lens Model Meta-Analysis of Human Lie Judgments.
Maria Hartwig,Charles F. Bond +1 more
TL;DR: The results suggest that intuitive notions about deception are more accurate than explicit knowledge and that lie detection is more readily improved by increasing behavioral differences between liars and truth tellers than by informing lie-catchers of valid cues to deception.
Journal ArticleDOI
Guilty and innocent suspects’ strategies during police interrogations
TL;DR: In this paper, mock suspects were interrogated by police trainees who either were or were not trained in the technique to strategically use the evidence (the SUE technique), and analyses revealed that guilty suspects to a higher degree than innocent suspects applied strategies in order to appear truthful.
Journal ArticleDOI
Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: when training to detect deception works.
TL;DR: Police trainees either were or were not trained in strategically using the evidence when interviewing lying or truth telling mock suspects, and the trainees’ strategies as well as liars’ and truth tellers’ counter-strategies were analyzed.
Journal ArticleDOI
A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading
Pär Anders Granhag,Maria Hartwig +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, a theoretical framework is sketched, based upon psychological notions from three domains: (a) the psychology of mind-reading, (b) self-regulation, and (c) psychology of guilt and innocence).
Journal ArticleDOI
Detecting deception via strategic disclosure of evidence.
TL;DR: The main prediction was that observers would obtain higher accuracy rates if the evidence against the suspects was presented in a late rather than early stage of the interrogation, and this prediction received support.