scispace - formally typeset
M

Marianne C. Stewart

Researcher at University of Texas at Dallas

Publications -  83
Citations -  3118

Marianne C. Stewart is an academic researcher from University of Texas at Dallas. The author has contributed to research in topics: Voting & Politics. The author has an hindex of 25, co-authored 82 publications receiving 3004 citations. Previous affiliations of Marianne C. Stewart include University of Essex & University of Texas at Austin.

Papers
More filters
Book

Political Choice in Britain

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the political choice in Britain before and after the 2001 general election and found that the majority of voters did not vote in the 2001 election and the subsequent campaign.
Book

Performance Politics and the British Voter

TL;DR: The authors argue that voters rely heavily on partisan cues and party leader images as guides to electoral choice, and that performance politics is at the heart of contemporary democracy, with voters forming judgments about how well competing parties and leaders perform on important issues.
Journal ArticleDOI

Does Mode Matter For Modeling Political Choice? Evidence From the 2005 British Election Study

TL;DR: The results of an extensive survey comparison experiment conducted as part of the 2005 British Election Study as discussed by the authors show statistically significant, but generally small, differences in distributions of key explanatory variables in models of turnout and party choice.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prospections, Retrospections, and Rationality: The "Bankers" Model of Presidential Approval Reconsidered

TL;DR: MacKuen, Erikson, and Stimson (1992) recently have challenged a long-standing conventional wisdom by claiming that sociotropic prospections dominate presidential approval models as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

The decline of parties in the minds of citizens

TL;DR: For example, this article found that the United States, Canada, and Great Britain have experienced significant dealignments of degree over the past 40 years, with decreasing percentages of strong party identifiers, increasing percentages of independents and non-identifiers, and increasing individual-level instability in party identifications.