Showing papers by "Marianne Skogbrott Birkeland published in 2022"
TL;DR: In this article , the authors examined the psychometric properties of the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen 2 (CATS-2) as a measure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) according to DSM-5 and (Complex) PTSD following the ICD-11 criteria in children and adolescents (7-17 years).
Abstract: ABSTRACT Background: The study examined the psychometric properties of the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen 2 (CATS-2) as a measure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) according to DSM-5 and (Complex) PTSD following the ICD-11 criteria in children and adolescents (7–17 years). Methods: Psychometric properties were investigated in an international sample of traumatized children and adolescents (N = 283) and their caregivers (N = 255). We examined the internal consistency (α), convergent and discriminant validity, the factor structure of the CATS-2 total scores, latent classes of PTSD/Complex PTSD (CPTSD) discrimination, as well as the diagnostic utility using ROC-curves. Results: The DSM-5 total score (self: α = .89; caregiver: α = .91), the ICD-11 PTSD total score (self: α = .67; caregiver: α = .79) and the ICD-11 CPTSD total score (self: α = .83; caregiver: α = .87) have proven acceptable to excellent reliability. The latent structure of the 12-item ICD-11 PTSD/CPTSD construct was consistent with prior findings. Latent profile analyses revealed that ICD-11 CPTSD was empirically distinguishable from ICD-11 PTSD using the CATS-2. ROC-analysis using the CAPS-CA-5 as outcome revealed that CATS-2 DSM-5 PTSD scores of ≥21 (screening) to ≥25 (diagnostic) were optimally efficient for detecting probable DSM-5 PTSD diagnosis. For the ICD-11 PTSD scale scores of ≥7 (screening) to ≥9 (diagnostic) were optimally efficient for detecting probable DSM-5 PTSD diagnosis. Conclusions: The CATS-2 is a brief, reliable and valid measure of DSM-5 PTSD, ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD symptomatology in traumatized children and adolescents, allowing crosswalk between diagnostic systems using one measure. HIGHLIGHTS The CATS-2 screens for potentially traumatic events (PTEs) and PTSD symptoms. The CATS-2 captures DSM-5 and ICD-11 criteria for PTSD and CPTSD and enables clinicians and researchers to crosswalk between both diagnostic systems. International validation has proven good psychometric properties and presents cut-off scores The CATS-2 is a license-free instrument and is freely accessible.
13 citations
TL;DR: The overall frequencies of PTSS were highest following sexual trauma; somewhat lower for domestic violence and severe bullying or threats and lowest after community violence, non-interpersonal trauma and sudden loss or serious illness.
Abstract: Background Characteristics of traumatic events may be associated with the level and specific manifestation of posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). This study examined the differences and similarities between overall levels, profiles and networks of PTSS after sexual trauma, domestic violence, community violence, non‐interpersonal trauma, sudden loss or serious illness of a loved one, and severe bullying or threats. Methods PTSS were measured in a clinical sample of 4,921 children and adolescents (6–18 years old, M = 14.0, SD = 2.7, 63.7% female) referred to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. We compared 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each symptom with 95% CI for overall PTSS within each trauma type (self‐reported worst trauma). We also computed cross‐sectional networks and searched for differences in networks according to trauma type and overall symptom level. Results The overall frequencies of PTSS were highest following sexual trauma; somewhat lower for domestic violence and severe bullying or threats and lowest after community violence, non‐interpersonal trauma and sudden loss or serious illness. Psychological cue reactivity, avoidance and difficulties with sleeping and concentrating were generally among the most frequent symptoms. Sexual trauma, domestic violence and severe bullying or threats were associated with higher frequencies of negative beliefs and persistent negative emotional states. Few differences in symptom networks across trauma type emerged. Conclusion Different types of trauma exposure may be associated with different profiles of symptom frequencies. Knowledge about this may be useful for clinicians and for the movement towards evidence‐based personalized psychological treatment.
4 citations
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors examined whether Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) is useful in reducing PTSD and CPTSD in traumatized youth.
Abstract: ABSTRACT Background: Complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) has recently been added to the ICD-11 diagnostic system for classification of diseases. The new disorder adds three symptom clusters to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) related to disturbances in self-organization (affect dysregulation, negative self-concept, and disturbances in relationships). Little is known whether recommended evidence-based treatments for PTSD in youth are helpful for youth with CPTSD. Objectives: This study examined whether Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) is useful in reducing PTSD and CPTSD in traumatized youth. Methods: Youth (n = 73, 89.0% girls, M age = 15.4 SD = 1.8) referred to one of 23 Norwegian child and adolescent mental health clinics that fulfilled the criteria for PTSD or CPTSD according to ICD-11 and received TF-CBT were included in the study. Assessments were conducted pre-treatment, and every fifth session. Linear mixed effects models were run to investigate whether youth with CPTSD and PTSD responded differently to TF-CBT. Results: Among the 73 youth, 61.6% (n = 45) fulfilled criteria for CPTSD and 38.4% (n = 28) fulfilled criteria for PTSD. There were no differences in sex, age, birth country, trauma type, number of trauma types or treatment length across groups. Youth with CPTSD had a steeper decline in PTSD and CPTSD compared to youth with PTSD. The groups reported similar levels of PTSD and CPTSD post-treatment. The percentage of youth who dropped out of treatment was not different across groups. Further, the groups did not differ significantly in number of received treatment sessions. Conclusions: This is the first study to examine whether TF-CBT is helpful for youth who have CPTSD using a validated instrument for measuring CPTSD. The results suggest that TF-CBT may be useful for treating CPTSD in youth. These are promising findings that should be replicated in studies with larger sample sizes. HIGHLIGHTS TF-CBT is a recommended treatment for youth with PTSD. The ICD-11 introduced a new sibling disorder for Complex PTSD (CPTSD), but no studies have examined whether TF-CBT may be helpful for youth with CPTSD using a validated instrument. The results show that youth with CPTSD respond well to TF-CBT.
1 citations