Qu'est-ce qu'un auteur ?

Fragment of an analysis of a case of hysteria

Why should wait for some days to get or receive the foundations of psychoanalysis a philosophical critique book that you order? Why should you take it if you can get the faster one? You can find the same book that you order right here. This is it the book that you can receive directly after purchasing. This foundations of psychoanalysis a philosophical critique is well known book in the world, of course many people will try to own it. Why don't you become the first? Still confused with the way?

The foundations of psychoanalysis: A philosophical critique.

Psycho-analytic notes on an autobiographical account of a case of paranoia

“The Direction of the Treatment and the Principles of Its Power” is a paper Lacan wrote in 1958 and published in 1961. It deals with two propositions: (1) “a psychoanalyst directs the treatment [. . .] he must not direct the patient” and (2) the unconscious desire directs the treatment. This direction is at work in every analysis. This paper argues that Freud and Lacan’s views about the outcome of treatment were not so different.

The Direction of the Treatment and the Principles of Its Power

In psychoanalysis, the question of child’s play owes its fame to child psychoanalysts. Before the emergence of child psychoanalysis, however, Sigmund Freud had evoked the question of child’s play i...

The importance of not being Ernest: An archaeology of child's play in Freud's writings (and some implications for psychoanalytic theory and practice).

“Playing is itself a therapy,” argues Winnicott, in one of the most famous phrases in the history of psychoanalysis. Despite its seductiveness, this paper suggests that this powerful proposition sh...

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00207578.2017.1399068

Winnicott's theory of playing: a reconsideration.

Forty years after its publication in 1977, The Piggle has recently provoked new interest among researchers. Most notably, the real "Gabrielle" has shared her story with D. Luepnitz and the analytical community. Joining in this vibrant discussion, this paper aims at shedding new light on the case by focusing on The Piggle as a "set-up," namely on the heterogenous ensemble of discursive and non-discursive elements which determined the analytical process. This reconsideration, although grounded in a Lacanian framework, supposes opening a dialogue between the French and English-speaking literature on the case. Three issues are at stake. First the paper intends to uncover the logic at work in the cure, studying it from the perspective of the analyst and the child, but also from that of the parents. Second, this triple focus is key to a reconsideration of the set-up of psychoanalysis with children more generally-in so far as it questions the function of infantile neurosis and what Winnicott calls "psychoanalysis partage." Third, it will look at the powerful effects of co-writing and co-publishing with the parents-considered as part of the set-up itself rather than exterior to the process of the cure-on the analytical outcome.

"Psychoanalysis partagé": Winnicott, The Piggle, and the set-up of child analysis.

On retient en general de la theorie winnicottienne du jeu une version optimiste : le playing (fait de jouer) designe une experience creatrice qui permet au sujet de decouvrir, de maniere immanente et dans le transfert, un rapport au monde inedit. En cela, le jeu se revele « en lui-meme therapeutique ». Sans contester cette dimension, c’est un autre aspect du jeu, moins « lumineux », qui est ici envisage. Apres avoir rappele combien l’experience positive du playing suppose dialectiquement la negativite de l’experience de la formlessness (l’informe), cet article s’attache a l’etude de deux jeux qui, dans Jeu et realite, constituent des impasses a la theorie du playing : celui du « garcon a la ficelle » premierement, celui de la « femme qui faisait des reussites », ensuite. Comportant d’indeniables incidences pour la clinique actuelle avec les enfants, est ainsi restituee a la pensee winnicottienne une dimension tragique.

/pdf/le-jeu-et-le-tragique-dans-playing-and-reality-de-winnicott-4q5cth9tgy.pdf

Le jeu et le tragique dans Playing and Reality de Winnicott

This article can be characterized as a 'rediscovery' of a notion of psychoanalysis that had disappeared or had been confused by later operations. The authors explore a Freudian notion that has been unjustly misunderstood, especially because of the multiple ways in which 'Unglaube' - disbelief - has been translated. We shall establish the archaeology of this term in Freud by extracting its three significant modes. Firstly, paranoiac disbelief designates an unconscious process of the rejection of belief in the subject's first encounter with a sexual reality that is always traumatic. Secondly, the obsessional neurotic's disbelief, which we shall call 'incredulity', is a secondary, less radical refusal of belief, one that is different from its paranoiac counterpart. Finally, we shall envision a third - dialectical - type of disbelief, which Freud called 'act of disbelief' and which will enable us to approach the fundamental epistemic and ethical stakes for psychoanalysis.

/pdf/freudian-modalities-of-disbelief-4hohjzb0si.pdf

Marie Lenormand

Papers

The importance of not being Ernest: An archaeology of child's play in Freud's writings (and some implications for psychoanalytic theory and practice).

Winnicott's theory of playing: a reconsideration.

"Psychoanalysis partagé": Winnicott, The Piggle, and the set-up of child analysis.

Le jeu et le tragique dans Playing and Reality de Winnicott

Freudian modalities of disbelief