scispace - formally typeset
M

Maryam Sultana

Researcher at Kyungpook National University

Publications -  16
Citations -  451

Maryam Sultana is an academic researcher from Kyungpook National University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Background subtraction & Object detection. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 13 publications receiving 265 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Deep neural network concepts for background subtraction:A systematic review and comparative evaluation

TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide a review of deep neural network concepts in background subtraction for novices and experts in order to analyze this success and to provide further directions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Unsupervised deep context prediction for background estimation and foreground segmentation

TL;DR: A unified method based on Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) and image inpainting and a context prediction network, which is an unsupervised visual feature learning hybrid GAN model for texture enhancement.
Book ChapterDOI

Moving Object Detection on RGB-D Videos Using Graph Regularized Spatiotemporal RPCA

TL;DR: This work investigates the performance of online Spatiotemporal RPCA (SRPCA) algorithm for moving object detection using RGB-D videos and shows competitive results as compared to four state-of-the-art subspace learning methods.
Journal ArticleDOI

Unsupervised Moving Object Detection in Complex Scenes Using Adversarial Regularizations

TL;DR: A Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) based on a moving object detection algorithm, called MOD_GAN, is proposed, enabling the algorithm to learn generating background sequences using input from uniformly distributed random noise samples.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Dynamic Background Subtraction Using Least Square Adversarial Learning

TL;DR: The proposed method consisting of three loss-terms including least squares adversarial loss, L1-L Loss and Perceptual-Loss is evaluated on two benchmark datasets CDnet2014 and BMC and shows improved performance on both datasets compared with 10 existing state-of-the-art methods.