scispace - formally typeset
M

Matheus Araújo

Researcher at University of Minnesota

Publications -  28
Citations -  1410

Matheus Araújo is an academic researcher from University of Minnesota. The author has contributed to research in topics: Sentiment analysis & Continuous positive airway pressure. The author has an hindex of 12, co-authored 28 publications receiving 1140 citations. Previous affiliations of Matheus Araújo include Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais & Qatar Computing Research Institute.

Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Comparing and combining sentiment analysis methods

TL;DR: A new method that combines existing approaches, providing the best coverage results and competitive agreement is developed and a free Web service called iFeel is presented, which provides an open API for accessing and comparing results across different sentiment methods for a given text.
Journal ArticleDOI

SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods

TL;DR: A benchmark comparison of twenty-four popular sentiment analysis methods, covering messages posted on social networks, movie and product reviews, as well as opinions and comments in news articles is presented, highlighting the extent to which the prediction performance of these methods varies considerably across datasets.
Posted Content

A Benchmark Comparison of State-of-the-Practice Sentiment Analysis Methods.

Abstract: In the last few years thousands of scientific papers have explored sentiment analysis, several startups that measures opinions on real data have emerged, and a number of innovative products related to this theme have been developed. There are multiple methods for measuring sentiments, including lexical-based approaches and supervised machine learning methods. Despite the vast interest on the theme and wide popularity of some methods, it is unclear which method is better for identifying the polarity (i.e., positive or negative) of a message. Thus, there is a strong need to conduct a thorough apple-to-apple comparison of sentiment analysis methods, as they are used in practice, across multiple datasets originated from different data sources. Such a comparison is key for understanding the potential limitations, advantages, and disadvantages of popular methods. This study aims at filling this gap by presenting a benchmark comparison of twenty one popular sentiment analysis methods (which we call the state-of-the-practice methods). Our evaluation is based on a benchmark of twenty labeled datasets, covering messages posted on social networks, movie and product reviews, as well as opinions and comments in news articles. Our results highlight the extent to which the prediction performance of these methods varies widely across datasets. Aiming at boosting the development of this research area, we open the methods' codes and datasets used in this paper and we deploy a benchmark system, which provides an open API for accessing and comparing sentence-level sentiment analysis methods.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

An evaluation of machine translation for multilingual sentence-level sentiment analysis

TL;DR: Evaluating existing efforts proposed to do language specific sentiment analysis for English suggests that simply translating the input text on a specific language to English and then using one of the existing English methods can be better than the existing language specific efforts evaluated.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

iFeel: a system that compares and combines sentiment analysis methods

TL;DR: iFeel is a Web application that allows one to detect sentiments in any form of text including unstructured social media data and provides a single platform to compare the strengths and weaknesses of various sentiment analysis methods with a user friendly interface.