scispace - formally typeset
M

Matthew Franchetti

Researcher at University of Toledo

Publications -  70
Citations -  956

Matthew Franchetti is an academic researcher from University of Toledo. The author has contributed to research in topics: Municipal solid waste & Lean Six Sigma. The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 68 publications receiving 851 citations. Previous affiliations of Matthew Franchetti include Purdue University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Critical factors for implementing ISO 14001 standard in United States industrial companies

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present the results of an empirical study carried out on a sample of certified industrial companies that operate in the United States, with the aim of identifying some of the critical factors for successful implementation of the ISO 14001 registration process.
Journal ArticleDOI

Economic and environmental analysis of four different configurations of anaerobic digestion for food waste to energy conversion using LCA for: a food service provider case study.

TL;DR: The findings from the case study indicated that implementing on-site waste to energy systems will result in lower operation costs and lower environmental impacts, and a standardized environmental and economic comparison of competing food Waste to energy technologies is provided.
Journal ArticleDOI

Recycling performance of firms before and after adoption of the ISO 14001 standard

TL;DR: In this article, the impact of ISO 14001 certification on recycling performance was studied based on a survey conducted on a sample of certified industrial companies that operate in United States, which revealed that companies' recycling performance is significantly positively affected by certification.
Journal ArticleDOI

An economic analysis comparing the cost feasibility of replacing injection molding processes with emerging additive manufacturing techniques

TL;DR: In this paper, the cost structure and break-even points of additive manufacturing (AM) versus traditional manufacturing methods were compared and the relationship to the overall cost structure was analyzed. But the analysis was limited to AM-based and non-AM-based methods.