Foreign body reaction to biomaterials.

https://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~damlacetin/kmu407/index_dosyalar/4.%20makale.pdf

Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials

The search for understanding the interactions of nanosized materials with living organisms is leading to the rapid development of key applications, including improved drug delivery by targeting nanoparticles, and resolution of the potential threat of nanotechnological devices to organisms and the environment. Unless they are specifically designed to avoid it, nanoparticles in contact with biological fluids are rapidly covered by a selected group of biomolecules to form a corona that interacts with biological systems. Here we review the basic concept of the nanoparticle corona and its structure and composition, and highlight how the properties of the corona may be linked to its biological impacts. We conclude with a critical assessment of the key problems that need to be resolved in the near future.

/pdf/biomolecular-coronas-provide-the-biological-identity-of-3m15njjzti.pdf

Biomolecular coronas provide the biological identity of nanosized materials

On the mechanisms of biocompatibility.

Biomaterial-associated thrombosis: roles of coagulation factors, complement, platelets and leukocytes

Investigation of recombinant human elastin polypeptides as non-thrombogenic coatings.

The criteria for nonthrombogenicity are classically defined as long clotting times and minimal platelet deposition. The inability to point to unequivocal progress in the development of truly nonthrombogenic materials, highlights the inadequacy if not actually invalidity of these criteria. Our approach is to define nonthrombogenicity in terms of: (1) a thrombin production rate constant, kp < 10-4 cm s-1; (2) low platelet consumption and low degree of platelet activation (e.g., microparticle formation); (3) perhaps some platelet spreading; and (4) low complement and leukocyte activation. Only when the target becomes clear, will it be possible to identify clear strategies for producing the materials we need.

What really is blood compatibility

With some exceptions, surface chemistry had little effect on platelet and leukocyte activation, and cell deposition, by scanning electron microscopy after blood exposure and clotting times among a group of 12 unmodified and plasma modified tubings. All materials activated platelets and leukocytes to detectable levels, although some materials increased the value of one activation parameter but not another. Unmodified materials [polyethylene (PE), Pellethane (PEU), latex, nylon, and Silastic] and modified materials (H(2)O plasma treated PE and PEU, CF(4) plasma treated PE, fluorinated PEU, NH(4) plasma treated PEU, polyethylene imine treated PEU, and heparin treated PEU) were characterised by XPS and contact angle. The objective of this project was to define a series of assays for the evaluation of hemocompatibility of cardiovascular devices with a view to clarify the specific requirements of ISO-10993-4, and to define an appropriate screening program for new blood contacting biomaterials. PE, PE--CF(4), PE--H(2)0, PEU--F, latex, and PEU-heparin were the exceptions to the general observations, although each behaved differently. PE proved to be least reactive, whereas PE-CF(4) was most reactive by several assays. Platelet microparticle formation (determined by flow cytometry), PTT, postblood exposure SEM, total SC5b-9, C3a, and platelet and leukocyte loss (cell counts) were able to distinguish differences among these materials, and often, but not always, showed expected correlations.

Does surface chemistry affect thrombogenicity of surface modified polymers

Neutrophil activation for adherent and nonadherent cells, as measured by flow cytometry, was not strongly dependent on material surface chemistry. We had hypothesized that material-induced neutrophil activation was an important parameter associated with material failure. All materials tested [cellophane, an acrylonitrile copolymer (AN69), Pellethane, nylon, polyethylene terephthalate, low density polyethylene, and polydimethylsiloxane] activated isolated human neutrophils, which were resuspended in plasma or serum, to similar extents based on L-selectin shedding, CD11b upregulation, and stimulation of the oxidative burst after 30-min exposure. Inhibition of complement activation by sCR1 unexpectedly had little effect if any on nonadherent neutrophils. However, neutrophil adhesion, but not the level of activation of the adherent cells, was strongly dependent on complement activation. Pretreatment with albumin did not inhibit adhesion or reduce neutrophil activation, but plasma pretreatment resulted in increased activation for nonadherent and adherent cells. More adhesion and a higher level of activation of adherent cells was observed following pretreatment with fibrinogen, a ligand of CD11b. Taken together these results suggest that upon contact with a material, neutrophil activation may occur though mechanisms that are not mediated by complement. For example, the presence of plasma proteins such as fibrinogen at the interface may trigger activation and the release of other activating agents. Although the material differences are small, the extent of activation may be significant and warrant further study of the mechanism and consequences of that activation.

Maud B. Gorbet

Papers

Biomaterial-associated thrombosis: roles of coagulation factors, complement, platelets and leukocytes

Investigation of recombinant human elastin polypeptides as non-thrombogenic coatings.

What really is blood compatibility

Does surface chemistry affect thrombogenicity of surface modified polymers

Flow cytometric study of in vitro neutrophil activation by biomaterials.