2D\n: two-dimensional\n99mTc-DPD\n: 99mTechnetium-3,3-diphosphono- 1,2-propanodi-carboxylic acid\nACE\n: angiotensin-converting enzyme\nAF\n: atrial fibrillation\nAL\n: amyloid light chain\nAR\n: aortic regurgitation\nARB\n: angiotensin receptor blocker\nATTR\n: amyloidosis-transthyretin type\nAV\n: atrioventricular\nBiVAD\n: biventricular assist device\nBNP\n: brain natriuretic peptide\nBPM\n: Beats per minute\nCCS\n: Canadian Cardiovascular Society\nCFC\n: cardiofacialcutaneous\nCHA2DS2-VASc\n: Congestive Heart failure, hypertension, Age ≥75 (doubled), Diabetes, Stroke (doubled), Vascular disease, Age 65–74, and Sex (female)\nCMR\n: cardiac magnetic resonance\nCRT\n: cardiac resynchronization therapy\nCRT-D\n: cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator\nCRT-P\n: Cardiac resynchronization therapy with a pacemaker\nCT\n: computed tomography\nDC\n: direct current\nDNA\n: deoxyribonucleic acid\nE/A\n: ratio of mitral peak velocity of early filling (E) to mitral peak velocity of late filling (A)\nE/e’\n: ratio of early transmitral flow velocity (E) to early mitral annulus velocity (e’)\nEACTS\n: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery\nECG\n: electrocardiogram\nEF\n: ejection fraction\nEPS\n: electrophysiological study\nESC\n: European Society of Cardiology\nFDA\n: (US) Food and Drug Administration\nFHL1\n: four and a half LIM domains 1\nHAS-BLED\n: hypertension, abnormal renal/liver function, stroke, bleeding history or predisposition, labile INR, elderly (>65 years), drugs/alcohol concomitantly\nHCM\n: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy\nhs-cTnT\n: high sensitivity cardiac troponin T\nHTS\n: high throughput sequencing\nICD\n: implantable cardioverter defibrillator\nILR\n: implantable loop recorder\nINR\n: international normalized ratio\nIUD\n: intrauterine device\nLA\n: left atrium\nLAMP-2\n: lysosome-associated membrane protein 2\nLBBB\n: left bundle branch block\nLEOPARD\n: Lentigines, ECG abnormalities, Ocular hypertelorism, Pulmonary stenosis, Abnormal genitalia, Retardation of growth, and sensory-neural Deafness\nLGE\n: late gadolinium enhancement\nLV\n: left ventricular\nLVAD\n: left ventricular assist device\nLVH\n: left ventricular hypertrophy\nLVOTO\n: left ventricular outlow tract obstruction\nMADIT-RIT\n: Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial—Reduce Inappropriate Therapy\nMAPK\n: mitogen activated protein kinase\nMELAS\n: mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes\nMERFF\n: myoclonic epilepsy with ragged red fibres\nMRA\n: mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist\nMYBPC3\n: myosin-binding protein C, cardiac-type\nMYH7\n: myosin-7 (s-myosin heavy chain)\nMYL3\n: myosin light chain 3\nNOAC\n: new oral anticoagulants\nNSVT\n: non-sustained ventricular tachycardia\nNT-proBNP\n: N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide\nNYHA\n: New York Heart Association\nOAC\n: oral anticoagulants\no.d.\n: omni die (every day)\nPC-CMR\n: phase contrast cardiac magnetic resonance\nPDE5\n: phosphodiesterase type 5\nPET\n: positron emission tomography\nPRKAG2\n: gamma-2 sub-unit of the adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase\nRAAS\n: renin angiotensin aldosterone system\nRV\n: right ventricular\nSAM\n: systolic anterior motion\nSCD\n: sudden cardiac death\nSAA\n: septal alcohol ablation\nS-ICD™\n: Subcutaneous lead implantable cardioverter defibrillator\nSPECT\n: single photon emission computed tomography\nSSFP\n: steady-state free precession\nSVT\n: supraventricular tachycardia\nTOE\n: transoesophageal echocardiography\nTNNI3\n: troponin I, cardiac muscle\nTNNT2\n: troponin T, cardiac muscle\nTPM1\n: tropomyosin alpha-1 chain\nTTE\n: transthoracic echocardiography\nTTR\n: transthyretin\nVF\n: ventricular fibrillation\nVKA\n: vitamin K antagonist\nVT\n: ventricular tachycardia\nWHO\n: World Health Organization\n\nGuidelines summarize and evaluate all available evidence at the time of the writing process, on a particular issue with the aim of assisting health professionals in selecting the best management strategies for an individual patient, with a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome, as well as the risk-benefit-ratio of particular diagnostic or therapeutic means. Guidelines and recommendations should help the health professionals to make decisions in their daily practice. However, the final decisions concerning an individual patient must be made by the responsible health professional(s) in consultation with the patient and caregiver as appropriate.\n\nA great number of Guidelines have been issued in recent years by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) as well as by other societies and organisations. Because of the impact on clinical practice, quality criteria for the development of guidelines have been established in order to make all decisions transparent to the user. The recommendations for formulating and issuing ESC Guidelines can be found on the ESC website (http://www.escardio.org/guidelines-surveys/esc-guidelines/about/Pages/rules-writing.aspx). ESC Guidelines represent the official position of the ESC on a given topic and are regularly updated.\n\nMembers of this Task Force were selected by the ESC to represent professionals involved with the medical care of patients with this pathology. Selected experts in the field undertook a comprehensive review of the published evidence for management (including diagnosis, treatment, prevention and rehabilitation) of a given condition according to ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG) policy. A critical evaluation of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures was performed including assessment of the risk-benefit-ratio. Estimates of expected health outcomes for larger populations were included, where data exist. The level of evidence and the strength of recommendation of particular management options were weighed and graded according to predefined scales, as outlined in Tables 1 and 2 .\n\nThe experts of …

2014 ESC Guidelines on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

ACC
: American College of Cardiology
ACE
: angiotensin-converting enzyme
ACS
: acute coronary syndrome
AF
: atrial fibrillation
AGNES
: Arrhythmia Genetics in the Netherlands
AHA
: American Heart Association
AMIOVIRT
: AMIOdarone Versus Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator:

/pdf/2015-esc-guidelines-for-the-management-of-patients-with-3hzn8vw0c4.pdf

2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: The Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC)

2015 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death

/pdf/2015-esc-guidelines-for-the-management-of-patients-with-4lhfmy4xir.pdf

2015 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.

Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents summarize and evaluate all currently available evidence on a particular issue with the aim of assisting physicians in selecting the best management strategies for a typical patient, suffering from a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome, as well as the risk/benefit ratio of particular diagnostic or therapeutic means. Guidelines are no substitutes for textbooks. The legal implications of medical guidelines have been previously discussed.

A great number of Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents have been issued in recent years by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) as well as by other societies and organizations. Because of the impact on clinical practice, quality criteria for the development of guidelines have been established in order to make all decisions transparent to the user. The recommendations for formulating and issuing ESC Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents can be found on the ESC Web Site (http://www.escardio.org/guidelines).

In brief, experts in the field are selected and undertake a comprehensive review of the published evidence for management and/or prevention of a given condition. A critical evaluation of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures is performed, including assessment of the risk/benefit ratio. Estimates of expected health outcomes for larger societies are included, where data exist. The level of evidence and the strength of recommendation of particular treatment options are weighed and graded according to predefined scales, as outlined in Tables 1 and 2 .

View this table:

Table 1 
Classes of recommendations



View this table:

Table 2 
Levels of evidence



The experts of the writing panels have provided disclosure statements of all relationships they may have which might be perceived as real or potential sources of conflicts of interest. These disclosure forms are kept on file at the European Heart House Headquarters of the ESC. Any changes in conflict of interest that arise during the writing period must be notified …

/pdf/guidelines-for-the-diagnosis-and-management-of-syncope-19cqe5vz46.pdf

Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009): the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

/pdf/2015-esc-guidelines-for-the-management-of-patients-with-3w5q5u8zhj.pdf

2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: The Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC).

Patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) have an ongoing risk of sudden incapacitation that might cause harm to others while driving a car. Driving restrictions vary across different countries in Europe. The most recent recommendations for driving of ICD patients in Europe were published in 1997 and focused mainly on patients implanted for secondary prevention. In recent years there has been a vast increase in the number of patients with an ICD and in the percentage of patients implanted for primary prevention. The EHRA task force on ICD and driving was formed to reassess the risk of driving for ICD patients based on the literature available. The recommendations are summarized in the following table and are further explained in the document. [table: see text] Driving restrictions are perceived as difficult for patients and their families, and have an immediate consequence for their lifestyle. To increase the adherence to the driving restrictions, adequate discharge of education and follow-up of patients and family are pivotal. The task force members hope this document may serve as an instrument for European and national regulatory authorities to formulate uniform driving regulations.

/pdf/consensus-statement-of-the-european-heart-rhythm-association-1zqgy0kwt8.pdf

Consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association: updated recommendations for driving by patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) have an ongoing risk of sudden incapacitation that might cause harm to others while driving a car. Driving restrictions vary across different countries in Europe. The most recent recommendations for driving of ICD patients in Europe were published in 1997 and focused mainly on patients implanted for secondary prevention. In recent years there has been a vast increase in the number of patients with an ICD and in the percentage of patients implanted for primary prevention. The EHRA task force on ICD and driving was formed to reassess the risk of driving for ICD patients based on the literature available. The recommendations are summarized in the following table and are further explained in the document, (Table see text). Driving restrictions are perceived as difficult for patients and their families, and have an immediate consequence for their lifestyle. To increase the adherence to the driving restrictions, adequate discharge of education and follow-up of patients and family are pivotal. The task force members hope this document may serve as an instrument for European and national regulatory authorities to formulate uniform driving regulations.

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2010.01.001

Consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association: Updated recommendations for driving by patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Maurizio Santomauro

Papers

Consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association: updated recommendations for driving by patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association: Updated recommendations for driving by patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators