scispace - formally typeset
M

Melanie Luppa

Researcher at Leipzig University

Publications -  222
Citations -  8877

Melanie Luppa is an academic researcher from Leipzig University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Dementia & Population. The author has an hindex of 48, co-authored 177 publications receiving 7514 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Prediction of Institutionalization in the Elderly. A Systematic Review

TL;DR: Findings suggested that predictors of NHP are mainly based on underlying cognitive and/or functional impairment, and associated lack of support and assistance in daily living, and the methodical quality of studies needs improvement.
Journal ArticleDOI

Age- and gender-specific prevalence of depression in latest-life – Systematic review and meta-analysis

TL;DR: It is evident that latest life depression is common, particularly focusing on age- and gender-specific rates across the latest-life age groups, and sampling strategies for the old age study populations should be addressed more thoroughly in future research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Review: health care utilization and costs of elderly persons with multiple chronic conditions.

TL;DR: This systematic literature review identified and summarized 35 studies that investigated the relationship between multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) and health care utilization outcomes (i.e. physician use, hospital use, medication use) andhealth care cost outcomes (medication costs, out-of-pocket costs, total health care costs) for elderly general populations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cost-of-illness studies of depression: a systematic review.

TL;DR: Depression is associated with a high economic burden and conducting COI-studies of depression along the line noted in the review could help provide the opportunity to expose differences in costs associated with different approaches to disease management.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prediction of institutionalisation in dementia. A systematic review.

TL;DR: The overview of research activities in this area showed a lack of methodological strength in a large part of identified studies, Nevertheless, a lot of well-examined and less highlighted predictors could be identified.