scispace - formally typeset
M

Michael Reiss

Researcher at Institute of Education

Publications -  391
Citations -  7062

Michael Reiss is an academic researcher from Institute of Education. The author has contributed to research in topics: Science education & Curriculum. The author has an hindex of 38, co-authored 364 publications receiving 6288 citations. Previous affiliations of Michael Reiss include University of Cambridge & University College London.

Papers
More filters
Book

The allometry of growth and reproduction

TL;DR: The scaling of average daily metabolic rate and energy intake and the intraspecific relationship of parental investment to female body weight are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Towards a More Authentic Science Curriculum: The contribution of out‐of‐school learning

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an evolutionary model of science teaching that looks at where learning and teaching take place, and draws together thinking about the history of science and developments in the nature of learning over the past 100 years or so.
Book

Ecology: Principles and Applications

TL;DR: The second edition has been brought up to date with current syllabuses by the addition of further material on the key issue of conservation, giving excellent coverage of the principles of conservation and using case studies to provide examples of conservation policies in practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

Practical work: Its effectiveness in primary and secondary schools in England

TL;DR: The first baseline evaluation of the effectiveness of practical work is based on a study of a diverse range of 30 practical lessons undertaken in non-selective primary and secondary (n = 10 and secondary) schools prior to the teachers undertaking a training intervention designed to improve their effective use of the practical work as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Students' understandings of human organs and organ systems

TL;DR: In this paper, a cross-sectional approach was used involving a total of 158 students in England from six different age groups (ranging from 4 year-olds to first year undergraduates) who were given a blank piece of A4-sized paper and asked to draw what they thought was inside themselves.