scispace - formally typeset
M

Michel Aurnague

Researcher at University of Toulouse

Publications -  60
Citations -  668

Michel Aurnague is an academic researcher from University of Toulouse. The author has contributed to research in topics: Locative case & Motion (physics). The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 59 publications receiving 654 citations. Previous affiliations of Michel Aurnague include Centre national de la recherche scientifique.

Papers
More filters

A three-level approach to the semantics of space

TL;DR: To analyze the semantics of some of these expressions, this work systematically looks for valid reasoning schemata involving them and enables the testing of the proposed formal system as well as the evaluation of the definitions obtained for the studied lexemes.
BookDOI

The Categorization of Spatial Entities in Language and Cognition

TL;DR: This chapter discusses the role of function, motion and saliency in the processing of the French Internal Localization Nouns avant/devant and characterizing categories of spatial entities: Formal ontology.

Les noms de localisation interne - Tentative de caractérisation sémantique à partir de données du basque et du français

TL;DR: In this article, the analysis of internal localization nouns (ILNs) is considered in the framework of the general studies on part-whole relations or meronomies, and it seems that ILNs diachronicly derive from component nouns and acquire, during such an evolution, semantic properties which make them real relational markers of spatial localization.
Book ChapterDOI

Part-of relations, functionality and dependence

TL;DR: In this article, the ontological categories of the arguments of a part-whole relation are analyzed and four cases of component-integral whole (CIW) relations are formally defined.
Journal ArticleDOI

How motion verbs are spatial: The spatial foundations of intransitive motion verbs in French

TL;DR: In this paper, a categorization of French intransitive verbs of change of relation and placement is proposed, which is based on the way these two notions interact in their semantics.