Machine Learning is the study of methods for programming computers to learn. Computers are applied to a wide range of tasks, and for most of these it is relatively easy for programmers to design and implement the necessary software. However, there are many tasks for which this is difficult or impossible. These can be divided into four general categories. First, there are problems for which there exist no human experts. For example, in modern automated manufacturing facilities, there is a need to predict machine failures before they occur by analyzing sensor readings. Because the machines are new, there are no human experts who can be interviewed by a programmer to provide the knowledge necessary to build a computer system. A machine learning system can study recorded data and subsequent machine failures and learn prediction rules. Second, there are problems where human experts exist, but where they are unable to explain their expertise. This is the case in many perceptual tasks, such as speech recognition, hand-writing recognition, and natural language understanding. Virtually all humans exhibit expert-level abilities on these tasks, but none of them can describe the detailed steps that they follow as they perform them. Fortunately, humans can provide machines with examples of the inputs and correct outputs for these tasks, so machine learning algorithms can learn to map the inputs to the outputs. Third, there are problems where phenomena are changing rapidly. In finance, for example, people would like to predict the future behavior of the stock market, of consumer purchases, or of exchange rates. These behaviors change frequently, so that even if a programmer could construct a good predictive computer program, it would need to be rewritten frequently. A learning program can relieve the programmer of this burden by constantly modifying and tuning a set of learned prediction rules. Fourth, there are applications that need to be customized for each computer user separately. Consider, for example, a program to filter unwanted electronic mail messages. Different users will need different filters. It is unreasonable to expect each user to program his or her own rules, and it is infeasible to provide every user with a software engineer to keep the rules up-to-date. A machine learning system can learn which mail messages the user rejects and maintain the filtering rules automatically. Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis. Statistics focuses on understanding the phenomena that have generated the data, often with the goal of testing different hypotheses about those phenomena. Data mining seeks to find patterns in the data that are understandable by people. Psychological studies of human learning aspire to understand the mechanisms underlying the various learning behaviors exhibited by people (concept learning, skill acquisition, strategy change, etc.).

Machine learning

Data Mining - Concepts and Techniques.

We describe the design and use of the Stanford CoreNLP toolkit, an extensible pipeline that provides core natural language analysis. This toolkit is quite widely used, both in the research NLP community and also among commercial and government users of open source NLP technology. We suggest that this follows from a simple, approachable design, straightforward interfaces, the inclusion of robust and good quality analysis components, and not requiring use of a large amount of associated baggage.

/pdf/the-stanford-corenlp-natural-language-processing-toolkit-1gq0vc5495.pdf

The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit

Recent progress in natural language processing has been driven by advances in both model architecture and model pretraining. Transformer architectures have facilitated building higher-capacity models and pretraining has made it possible to effectively utilize this capacity for a wide variety of tasks. Transformers is an open-source library with the goal of opening up these advances to the wider machine learning community. The library consists of carefully engineered state-of-the art Transformer architectures under a unified API. Backing this library is a curated collection of pretrained models made by and available for the community. Transformers is designed to be extensible by researchers, simple for practitioners, and fast and robust in industrial deployments. The library is available at https://github.com/huggingface/transformers.

/pdf/transformers-state-of-the-art-natural-language-processing-1zozhnrntv.pdf

Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing

We propose a hierarchical attention network for document classification. Our model has two distinctive characteristics: (i) it has a hierarchical structure that mirrors the hierarchical structure of documents; (ii) it has two levels of attention mechanisms applied at the wordand sentence-level, enabling it to attend differentially to more and less important content when constructing the document representation. Experiments conducted on six large scale text classification tasks demonstrate that the proposed architecture outperform previous methods by a substantial margin. Visualization of the attention layers illustrates that the model selects qualitatively informative words and sentences.

/pdf/hierarchical-attention-networks-for-document-classification-2f4ul5pyx3.pdf

Hierarchical Attention Networks for Document Classification

The problem of performing open-domain Information Extraction (IE) was historically tied to the problem of ad-hoc acquisition of extraction patterns. In this paper we show that this requirement is not sufficient and that we also need to build new IE architectures that combine the role of linguistic patterns with coreference knowledge and ambiguous syntactic and semantic information. We present the implementation of a novel IE architecture, namely the CICERO system and show how (1) both high precision and high recall results were obtained for a variety of extraction domains; and (2) how textual information can be extracted for virtually any domain in a precise and reliable way. The evaluation of CICERO's performance shows a significant improvement over MUC IE systems.

Infrastructure for open-domain information extraction

The question answering (QA) task consists of providing short, relevant answers to natural language questions. Most QA research has focused on extracting information from text sources, providing the shortest relevant text in response to a question. For example, the correct answer to the question, “How many groups participate in the CHIL project?” is “15”, whereas the response to “Who are the partners in CHIL?” is a list of them. This simple example illustrates the two main advantages of QA over current search engines: First, the input is a natural-language question rather a keyword query; and second, the answer provides the desired information content and not simply a potentially large set of documents or URLs that the user must plow through.

Language Technologies: Question Answering in Speech Transcripts

Information Extraction (IE) systems typically rely on extraction patterns encoding domain-specific knowledge. When matched against natural language texts, these patterns recognize with high accuracy information relevant to the extraction task. Adapting an IE system to a new extraction scenario entails devising a new collection of extraction patterns - a time-consuming and expensive process. To overcome this obstacle, we have implemented in CICERO, our IE system, a pattern acquisition mechanism that combines lexicosemantic knowledge available from WordNet with syntactic information collected from training corpora. The open-domain nature of the knowledge encoded in WordNet grants portability of our approach across multiple extraction domains.

/pdf/automatic-discovery-of-linguistic-patterns-for-information-38kufy1y4b.pdf

Automatic Discovery of Linguistic Patterns for Information Extraction

Many approaches to automatically recognizing entailment relations have employed classifiers over hand engineered lexicalized features, or deep learning models that implicitly capture lexicalization through word embeddings. This reliance on lexicalization may complicate the adaptation of these tools between domains. For example, such a system trained in the news domain may learn that a sentence like “Palestinians recognize Texas as part of Mexico” tends to be unsupported, but this fact (and its corresponding lexicalized cues) have no value in, say, a scientific domain. To mitigate this dependence on lexicalized information, in this paper we propose a model that reads two sentences, from any given domain, to determine entailment without using lexicalized features. Instead our model relies on features that are either unlexicalized or are domain independent such as proportion of negated verbs, antonyms, or noun overlap. In its current implementation, this model does not perform well on the FEVER dataset, due to two reasons. First, for the information retrieval portion of the task we used the baseline system provided, since this was not the aim of our project. Second, this is work in progress and we still are in the process of identifying more features and gradually increasing the accuracy of our model. In the end, we hope to build a generic end-to-end classifier, which can be used in a domain outside the one in which it was trained, with no or minimal re-training.

/pdf/a-mostly-unlexicalized-model-for-recognizing-textual-49ela3o5dl.pdf

A mostly unlexicalized model for recognizing textual entailment

Recent efforts in bioinformatics have achieved tremendous progress in the machine reading of biomedical literature, and the assembly of the extracted biochemical interactions into large-scale models such as protein signaling pathways. However, batch machine reading of literature at today’s scale (PubMed alone indexes over 1 million papers per year) is unfeasible due to both cost and processing overhead. In this work, we introduce a focused reading approach to guide the machine reading of biomedical literature towards what literature should be read to answer a biomedical query as efficiently as possible. We introduce a family of algorithms for focused reading, including an intuitive, strong baseline, and a second approach which uses a reinforcement learning (RL) framework that learns when to explore (widen the search) or exploit (narrow it). We demonstrate that the RL approach is capable of answering more queries than the baseline, while being more efficient, i.e., reading fewer documents.

/pdf/learning-what-to-read-focused-machine-reading-427f70ntv0.pdf

Mihai Surdeanu

Papers

Infrastructure for open-domain information extraction

Language Technologies: Question Answering in Speech Transcripts

Automatic Discovery of Linguistic Patterns for Information Extraction

A mostly unlexicalized model for recognizing textual entailment

Learning what to read: Focused machine reading