scispace - formally typeset
M

Milada Anna Vachudova

Researcher at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Publications -  46
Citations -  4484

Milada Anna Vachudova is an academic researcher from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The author has contributed to research in topics: European union & European integration. The author has an hindex of 25, co-authored 45 publications receiving 3952 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999-2010

TL;DR: The CHES trend file as discussed by the authors contains measures of national party positioning on European integration, ideology and several European Union (EU) and non-EU policies for 1999−2010, and explores basic trends on party positioning since 1999.
Posted Content

Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration After Communism

TL;DR: The authors analyzes how an enlarging EU has facilitated a convergence toward liberal democracy among credible future members of the EU in Central and Eastern Europe, revealing how variations in domestic competition put democratizing states on different political trajectories after 1989, and how the EU's leverage eventually influenced domestic politics in liberal and particularly illiberal democracies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data

TL;DR: In this article, the variation of anti-corruption and anti-elite saliency in party positioning across Europe was studied. And it was shown that while anticorruption salience is primarily related to the (regional) context in which a party operates, anti-ELite salience was primarily a function of party ideology, and extreme left and extreme conservative (TAN) parties are significantly more likely to emphasize antielite views.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reliability and validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys on party positioning

TL;DR: In this article, the authors report on the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys (CHES), which measure national party positioning on European integration, ideology, and several European Union (EU) and non-EU policies.
Journal ArticleDOI

National Interests, State Power, and EU Enlargement

TL;DR: In previous rounds of EU enlargement, patterns of asymmetrical interdependence dictate that the applicants compromise more on the margin, contributing to a subjective sense of loss among those countries (the applicants) that benefit most as mentioned in this paper.